2014
DOI: 10.1007/s40032-014-0099-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Obstacle Avoidance Path Planning of Space Manipulator Based on Improved Artificial Potential Field Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…APFM is a method based on the local environmental information, which generate the motion path of the robotic end effector through determining the position increment of the end effector according to the direction of the resultant force of attraction and repulsion defined by the target and the obstacle [93]. Bounini et al [94] summarized the related works of the APFM, and concluded that the traditional method can be easily performed and has the high real-time performance when utilized to the navigation of the mobile robot, but has disadvantages as follows: (1) Under the case of many obstacles, the path search is highly possible to fall into the local minimum, causing the pheromone of robotic oscillation or stagnation; (2) We need to define the minimum distance between the robot and each obstacle to detect the collision and also predict the potential danger in real time.…”
Section: Artificial Potential Field Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…APFM is a method based on the local environmental information, which generate the motion path of the robotic end effector through determining the position increment of the end effector according to the direction of the resultant force of attraction and repulsion defined by the target and the obstacle [93]. Bounini et al [94] summarized the related works of the APFM, and concluded that the traditional method can be easily performed and has the high real-time performance when utilized to the navigation of the mobile robot, but has disadvantages as follows: (1) Under the case of many obstacles, the path search is highly possible to fall into the local minimum, causing the pheromone of robotic oscillation or stagnation; (2) We need to define the minimum distance between the robot and each obstacle to detect the collision and also predict the potential danger in real time.…”
Section: Artificial Potential Field Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The computation times n in OEM is proportional to the number of envelopes. And m is proportional to the number of cells holding a non-zero certainty value in a 2D Cartesian grid [19] [20], or is proportional to the integration points in the model using lines as the primitive [22] [23] [24]. Obviously, this condition can be satisfied on most occasions.…”
Section: Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…C-space method 16 can realize path planning and obstacle avoidance, but the calculation is complex and trajectory searching requires a long time, causing that the method could not meet real-time requirement. Artificial potential field method 17 is simple and widely used, but it is easily trapped to local minima, resulting in task failures. Gradient projection method 18 is not universal and may not be suitable to be applied in nonredundant manipulators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%