2017
DOI: 10.1177/0037549717711281
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Obstacle avoidance behavior of swarm robots based on aggregation and disaggregation method

Abstract: One of the current challenges in the development of swarm robots is making them realize obstacle avoidance while keeping formation. This paper proposes a new obstacle avoidance method for multiple robots based on the aggregation and disaggregation approach. First, the formation-based multi-resolution models of swarm robots are presented and the formation attribute-based consistency mapping functions are designed. Then, obstacle avoidance behavior based on aggregation and disaggregation method is presented and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent times, the focus on robotics has shifted from the individual robot to the multirobotic systems. [19][20][21][22][23] These systems can be used for situations such as cleaning, lawn mowing, and military surveillance. 24 In such systems, large number of robots with limited capabilities coordinate with each other to accomplish a common task.…”
Section: Comparison Of Bug-1 With Other Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent times, the focus on robotics has shifted from the individual robot to the multirobotic systems. [19][20][21][22][23] These systems can be used for situations such as cleaning, lawn mowing, and military surveillance. 24 In such systems, large number of robots with limited capabilities coordinate with each other to accomplish a common task.…”
Section: Comparison Of Bug-1 With Other Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though LF is a simple formation control strategy, the formation keeping is not guaranteed because there is no feedback. Therefore, if a follower fails to follow properly, no mechanism can guarantee the formation keeping (Yu et al, 2017). In general, this strategy depends on the leader vehicle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main disadvantage of the current virtual structure implementation is the centralization, which leads a single point of failure for the whole system. By behavior-based approach, several desired behaviors are prescribed for each robot, and the final action of each robot is derived by weighting the relative importance of each behavior [15], [16]. The limitation of such approach, it is difficult to analyze mathematically, therefore it is hard to guarantee a precise formation control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several technique have proposed to give a solution with good performance [21], [5], [15], [17], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29]. However, in the robotic application, there are some uncertainties in the system, due to the sensors imprecision, inaccurate actuator and environment change every time [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%