2002
DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.b.10001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Obsessive‐compulsive symptom dimensions in affected sibling pairs diagnosed with Gilles de la Tourette syndrome

Abstract: Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is an etiologically heterogeneous disorder. Recent factor analyses have consistently identified several symptom dimensions, two of which are associated with increased familial risk for OCD; aggressive, sexual, and religious obsessions and checking compulsions (FACTOR 1) and symmetry and ordering obsessions and compulsions (FACTOR 2). Both of these symptom dimensions are also frequently seen in association with Gilles de la Tourette syndrome (GTS). The purpose of this study w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

11
112
2
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(128 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
11
112
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…These results support the findings of some of the family studies investigating the familiality of OC symptom dimensions, based on Y-BOCS items [Leckman et al, 2003;Hasler et al, 2007]. Hasler et al [2007] found significant sib-sib correlations for Checking compulsions and the Contamination/ Cleaning dimension.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results support the findings of some of the family studies investigating the familiality of OC symptom dimensions, based on Y-BOCS items [Leckman et al, 2003;Hasler et al, 2007]. Hasler et al [2007] found significant sib-sib correlations for Checking compulsions and the Contamination/ Cleaning dimension.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…They reported that the relatives of OCD probands who had high scores on either the YaleBrown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) factors ''aggressive/sexual/religious obsessions and related compulsions'' or ''symmetry/ordering'' were twice as likely to have first-degree family members with OCD compared to individuals with low scores on these factors. Leckman et al [2003] examined the familiality of OC symptom dimensions in sib pairs affected with Tourette syndrome. Significant correlations were observed between sib pairs as well as mother-child pairs for the ''aggressive/sexual/religious obsessions and checking compulsions'' factor, and for the ''symmetry/ordering obsessions and compulsions'' factor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The significant sib-sib association for the Taboo Thoughts factor is consistent with the findings of two prior segregation analyses (Alsobrook et al, 1999;Leckman et al, 2003), though those studies used the Leckman et al (1997) factor which also includes somatic obsessions and checking compulsions. As compared to the r ICC for Taboo Thoughts in the present study, Hasler et al (2007) reported a lower, yet still statistically significant, sib-sib correlation for their more heterogeneous obsessions/checking factor (same as the Leckman et al (1997) factor).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Alsobrook et al (1999) reported that the recurrence risk of OCD among first-degree relatives of probands with high scores on either the obsessions/ checking or symmetry/ordering factors was much higher than the recurrence risk among relatives of probands with low scores on these factors. In a segregation analysis, Leckman et al (2003) yielded significant correlations between siblings and mother-child pairs for the same two factors in a sample of Tourette Syndrome affected sibpairs and relatives. Cullen et al (2007) examined affected sibling similarity on four DFA-derived category-based factors in the Johns Hopkins OCD Family Study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…It is thought that the diverse phenomenological and treatment presentation of this disorder may reflect, in turn, a heterogeneity of susceptibility genes. Attempts at better defining more homogeneous OCD subgroups have been made at the level of symptom presentation (Hasler et al, 2006), age of OCD onset (Shugart et al, 2006), family history (Denys et al, 2006), and comorbidity patterns (Leckman et al, 2003). Despite the theoretical plausibility of these subgroups, studies assessing candidate genes in light of more unified OCD sub-phenotypes have also been marked by inconclusive findings and a lack of replication.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%