2019
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab2e05
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observing Supernova Neutrino Light Curves with Super-Kamiokande: Expected Event Number over 10 s

Abstract: Supernova neutrinos are crucially important to probe the final phases of massive star evolution. As is well known from observations of SN 1987A, neutrinos provide information on the physical conditions responsible for neutron star formation and on the supernova explosion mechanism. However, there is still no complete understanding of the long-term evolution of neutrino emission in supernova explosions, although there are a number of modern simulations of neutrino radiation hydrodynamics, which study neutrino e… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Provided the expense of 3D-GR simulations with spectral neutrino transport, our simulation covers only ∼ 300 ms postbounce. Recently, it is pointed out that galactic supernova neutrinos 6 , depending on the neutron star mass, can be observed over 10 s after bounce (Suwa et al (2019), see also Nakazato & Suzuki (2020)). Possible phase transition 6 Pioneering theoretical work of this topics especially focusing on the black hole formation includes Keil & Janka (1995); Baumgarte et al (1996) from hadronic to quark matter in the PNS (Fischer et al 2018) can be imprinted in the GW signals (Zha et al 2020).…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Provided the expense of 3D-GR simulations with spectral neutrino transport, our simulation covers only ∼ 300 ms postbounce. Recently, it is pointed out that galactic supernova neutrinos 6 , depending on the neutron star mass, can be observed over 10 s after bounce (Suwa et al (2019), see also Nakazato & Suzuki (2020)). Possible phase transition 6 Pioneering theoretical work of this topics especially focusing on the black hole formation includes Keil & Janka (1995); Baumgarte et al (1996) from hadronic to quark matter in the PNS (Fischer et al 2018) can be imprinted in the GW signals (Zha et al 2020).…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to explore the sensitivity of the results to uncertainties in Lν , ν and Rns evolution, we also use neutrino cooling curves from the recent calculations of Suwa et al (2019) [hereafter S19]. In Figure A1, we compare the P99 cooling curves with the low entropy Mns = 1.3 M (M1L) models of S19.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All data sets cover the time interval from 20msto520ms after the core bounce, which contains the shock stagnation and accretion phase. The earlier neutronization burst is much better understood and exhibits only minor variations between models (Kachelrieß et al 2005), while the later diffusive proto-neutron star cooling is expected to be quasistatic and physically much simpler than the hydrodynamic behavior of the shock wave (Suwa et al 2019;Li et al 2021). The accretion phase is thus expected to show the largest differences between models, making it most relevant for model discrimination.…”
Section: Data Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%