2012
DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/14/5/053021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observing mode propagation inside a laser cavity

Abstract: The mode inside a laser cavity may be understood as the interference of two counter-propagating waves, referred to as the forward and backward waves, respectively. We outline a simple experimental procedure, which does not require any additional components, to study the forward and backward propagating waves everywhere inside a laser cavity. We verify the previous theoretical-only prediction that the two fields may differ substantially in their amplitude profile, even for stable resonator systems, a result tha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…D). The output beam was captured using a CCD camera (Spiricon SPU260 BeamGage), placed in an image plane of S. Note that the field depends on the propagation direction (even in stable canonical resonators [28]), and the camera has been placed to record the image in the and M2 (radius of curvature R2, focal length F = R2/2), and an output coupler (OC) angled at 45 • with a 99.8% reflectivity. The geometrical length of the cavity was G, that of the Nd:YAG gain medium was g. S is the magnified self-conjugate plane.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…D). The output beam was captured using a CCD camera (Spiricon SPU260 BeamGage), placed in an image plane of S. Note that the field depends on the propagation direction (even in stable canonical resonators [28]), and the camera has been placed to record the image in the and M2 (radius of curvature R2, focal length F = R2/2), and an output coupler (OC) angled at 45 • with a 99.8% reflectivity. The geometrical length of the cavity was G, that of the Nd:YAG gain medium was g. S is the magnified self-conjugate plane.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…D). The output beam was captured using a CCD camera (Spiricon SPU260 BeamGage), placed in an image plane of S. Note that the field depends on the propagation direction (even in stable canonical resonators [28]), and the camera has been placed to record the image in the magnified self-conjugate plane, S, not the de-magnified self-conjugate plane, s, which corresponds to the same plane but the opposite propagation direction.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both exhibiting the same pattern structure, but different magnifications: one version is built up from a successive magnification of the original pattern of the aperture while the second is built up from a de-magnification of the original aperture pattern. 12 The self-similarity pattern version depends mainly on the beam propagation direction inside the laser cavity. For example, if the beam inside the cavity propagates from plane S to M 1 , M 1 to M 2 ,and M 2 to plane S, the fractal pattern is magnified by a factor M (= R 2 /R 1 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%