Observing entrepreneurs in networks: reflecting on the relationship between the researcher and the participants

Brett, Valerie; Neill, Aisling O’; O’Gorman, Bill

doi:10.1504/ijesb.2014.060892

Cited by 3 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Although Ettl and Welter's (2010) research applied the case study method, no mention is made to authors who grounded the election of method or other evidence on the research philosophy adopted. The same occurs with the study by Brett et al (2014), where no was provided about the research philosophy.…”

Section: Research Philosophiesmentioning

confidence: 77%

“…It is worth noting that the research philosophy of two of the studies (Brett, O'Neill, & O'Gorman, 2014;Ettl & Welter, 2010) could not be identified. Although Ettl and Welter's (2010) research applied the case study method, no mention is made to authors who grounded the election of method or other evidence on the research philosophy adopted.…”

Section: Research Philosophiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Entrepreneurial learning research: a positivist tradition?

Arantes

Freitag

2022

Cad. EBAPE.BR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article aims to systematically review the literature on Entrepreneurial Learning, analyzing the elements of studies published on the subject over time, with special emphasis on methodological approaches employed in empirical research. The motivation of the study is that this literature field is still fragmented. Moreover, previous reviews on the theme have not shed sufficient light on the methodological aspects of the research. Data were obtained through the Scopus database, and 356 articles were mapped with the support of VOSviewer software, revealing the evolution in the number of publications, cross-country relationships, and co-citation networks, among other metrics. An in-depth analysis of 38 articles published in the top five journals revealed the predominance of studies carried out in the European context, with entrepreneurs of technological companies, and at the individual level of analysis. Furthermore, a tradition of positivist studies was identified.

show abstract

Section: Research Philosophiesmentioning

confidence: 77%

Section: Research Philosophiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Entrepreneurial learning research: a positivist tradition?

Arantes

Freitag

2022

Cad. EBAPE.BR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Vale ressaltar que a filosofia de pesquisa de dois dos estudos (Brett, O'Neill, & O'Gorman, 2014;Ettl & Welter, 2010) não pôde ser identificada. Embora a pesquisa de Ettl e Welter (2010) tenha aplicado o método de estudo de caso, não há menção a autores que fundamentaram a escolha do método ou outras evidências na filosofia de pesquisa adotada.…”

Section: Filosofias De Pesquisaunclassified

Pesquisa em aprendizagem empreendedora: uma tradição positivista?

Arantes

Freitag

2022

Cad. EBAPE.BR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Resumo O objetivo deste artigo foi revisar sistematicamente a literatura sobre Aprendizagem Empreendedora, analisando os elementos dos estudos publicados sobre o tema ao longo do tempo, com ênfase especial nas abordagens metodológicas empregadas na pesquisa empírica. O estudo foi motivado devido ser um campo da literatura ainda fragmentado. Além disso, as revisões anteriores sobre o tema não lançaram luz suficiente sobre os aspectos metodológicos das pesquisas. Os dados foram obtidos por meio da base de dados Scopus e 356 artigos foram mapeados com o apoio do software VOSviewer, revelando a evolução no número de publicações, redes de relação entre países e de cocitação, entre outras métricas. A análise aprofundada de 38 artigos publicados nos cinco principais periódicos revelou a predominância de estudos realizados no contexto europeu, com empreendedores de empresas tecnológicas e no nível individual de análise. Além disso, identificou-se uma tradição de estudos positivistas.

show abstract

“…Rapport development allows the researcher to create a connection with the participant, regardless of the complexity and dilemmas that may surround the relationship (Stahl, 2016). Scholars should understand and follow the process of participant consent, the protection of privacy, storage requirements of data, and the scope of sharing data (Brett, O'Neill, & O'Gorman, 2014). Providing transparency is imperative in reporting, preparing analyses, disclosing conditions, sharing data, and sharing research materials (Steegen, Tuerlinckx, Gelman, & Vanpaemel, 2016).…”

Section: Ethical Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%