2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2011.01.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observer weighting of interaural cues in positive and negative envelope slopes of amplitude-modulated waveforms

Abstract: The auditory system can encode interaural delays in highpass-filtered complex sounds by phase locking to their slowly modulating envelopes. Spectrotemporal analysis of interaurally time delayed highpass waveforms reveals the presence of a concomitant interaural level cue. The current study systematically investigated the contribution of time and concomitant level cues carried by positive and negative envelope slopes of a modified sinusoidally amplitude-modulated (SAM) high-frequency carrier. The waveforms were… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(95 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, while it is not unusual for auditory experiments to employ three subjects per condition (Hsieh, Petrosyan, Goncalves, Hickok, & Saberi, 2011;Hsieh & Saberi, 2010), and while several statistical tests converge in support of the main conclusions of this experiment, one should nonetheless exercise some caution in interpreting these results due to the comparatively smaller number of subjects. Specific support, however, for a relatively robust effect includes (1) a statistically significant difference between fixed-level and randomlevel conditions; (2) an absence of an effect, as predicted, in the fixed-level condition that was additionally supported by Bayes factor analysis; and (3) completion of over 16,000 trials by the three subjects in a within-subject's design, which, even for psychophysical experiments, is a relatively large number.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Finally, while it is not unusual for auditory experiments to employ three subjects per condition (Hsieh, Petrosyan, Goncalves, Hickok, & Saberi, 2011;Hsieh & Saberi, 2010), and while several statistical tests converge in support of the main conclusions of this experiment, one should nonetheless exercise some caution in interpreting these results due to the comparatively smaller number of subjects. Specific support, however, for a relatively robust effect includes (1) a statistically significant difference between fixed-level and randomlevel conditions; (2) an absence of an effect, as predicted, in the fixed-level condition that was additionally supported by Bayes factor analysis; and (3) completion of over 16,000 trials by the three subjects in a within-subject's design, which, even for psychophysical experiments, is a relatively large number.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…To determine the accuracy with which a model of the auditory periphery can predict pitch-discrimination performance for the stimuli used in our study, we examined the output of an autocorrelation model with several frontend preprocessing stages. The model consisted of a bank of 30 fourthorder GammaTone bandpass filters spaced logarithmically from 50 to 3000 Hz (Holdsworth et al, 1988;Saberi, 2007, 2009;Hsieh et al, 2010Hsieh et al, , 2011Saberi and Petrosyan, 2005). Filter bandwidths were based on human auditory filter estimates measured in notched-noise (Glasberg and Moore, 1990).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%