1980
DOI: 10.1016/0016-5085(80)90135-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observer variation in assessment of liver biopsies including analysis by kappa statistics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0
2

Year Published

1985
1985
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
37
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The degree of the scoring changes for fibrosis and HAI were 2 or more points in the vast majority of specimens, and such differences have been shown to be highly reproducible by one or more observers [19,21,23]. These aspects of our study enhance confidence in the observations that fibrosis can commonly improve during corticosteroid treatment, but future studies are necessary to validate the conventional clinical assessments of fibrosis against noninvasive assays reflective of extracellular matrix proteins and/or hepatic stellate cell activity [13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…The degree of the scoring changes for fibrosis and HAI were 2 or more points in the vast majority of specimens, and such differences have been shown to be highly reproducible by one or more observers [19,21,23]. These aspects of our study enhance confidence in the observations that fibrosis can commonly improve during corticosteroid treatment, but future studies are necessary to validate the conventional clinical assessments of fibrosis against noninvasive assays reflective of extracellular matrix proteins and/or hepatic stellate cell activity [13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…The first can certainly be improved by clearly defined requirements for cutting and staining of biopsy samples and application of morphometric methods 3738 Making a histological diagnosis from different single features is a somewhat subjective integrating process which is influenced by an individual’s expertise 39. The decision making process for a diagnosis may also be influenced by the clinical data known to the pathologist.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, histological evaluation of liver tissue is prone to bias [1215]. In a study investigating human evaluation of liver steatosis in people revealed a high level of variability between human observation and standardized computer measurement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%