2020
DOI: 10.1109/tcst.2019.2944329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observer-Based Unknown Input Estimator of Wave Excitation Force for a Wave Energy Converter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(61 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is found by comparing the peak and trough calculation formulas obtained by fitting, and, combined with the experimental research results, the difference of the maximum wave force between pile groups at the peak and trough is about 1.1 times. erefore, in order to facilitate the application of the formula, the two fitting calculation formulas are combined to obtain (6), which is the final calculation formula of wave force on pile groups.…”
Section: Calculation Methods Of Wave Force Of Pile Groupmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is found by comparing the peak and trough calculation formulas obtained by fitting, and, combined with the experimental research results, the difference of the maximum wave force between pile groups at the peak and trough is about 1.1 times. erefore, in order to facilitate the application of the formula, the two fitting calculation formulas are combined to obtain (6), which is the final calculation formula of wave force on pile groups.…”
Section: Calculation Methods Of Wave Force Of Pile Groupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…erefore, in order to ensure the safety of large-scale seacrossing bridge structures, it is necessary to calculate the load on the large-scale structure accurately to preserve the marine life safely [5]. However, there is no clear formula and method for wave load calculation of large-scale structure in the current design code for sea-crossing bridge pier column foundation structure, the large-scale structure of seacrossing bridge is subjected to extreme waves and natural disasters [6,7]. e research on the impact of the combined load of water flow has become a concern for many species and sea life [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, to achieve the best control performance by non-causal LOC which requires 5 × T p wave excitation force prediction, it is essential to design a SM compensator to compensate for both estimation and prediction errors. The control performance with and without SM compensation is compared in the case of H s = 0.04 m and T p = 1.8 s. Since the proposed "ASMO + improved AR" strategy enables us to explicitly calculate the estimation boundary and the prediction boundary, the gain parameter of SMC can be determined by (20). The energy output and power generated are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Cwrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13, in which the minimal error bound is found to be 1.0668 with k 2 = 9.9 and µ 2 = 3.5. Hence, as calculated by (20), the minimal compensation gain is 1.038. The comparison among control performance with different tuning of parameters is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Simulation Set 4: Design Of Prediction Horizon N P and Comentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation