The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2021
DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.3036927
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observer-Based Adaptive Fuzzy Finite-Time Control Design With Prescribed Performance for Switched Pure-Feedback Nonlinear Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The resulting robust controller will be in a dynamical/static output-feedback form. Some recent works on the deterministic framework [19][20][21] offer some potential directions to be explored and adapted to our setting. On the other hand, we are interested by the generalization of our results to a more general setting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The resulting robust controller will be in a dynamical/static output-feedback form. Some recent works on the deterministic framework [19][20][21] offer some potential directions to be explored and adapted to our setting. On the other hand, we are interested by the generalization of our results to a more general setting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…@t ě t 0 ě 0, i P N , x 0 P X t 0 and xpsq " xps; t 0 , x 0 q is the solution of (1) or, equivalently, of its version (21). Employing (21b) and (25), we rewrite the first integral from the right hand side of (31) as…”
Section: A Lower Bound Of the Stability Radiusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was known that the neural networks (NNs) and the fuzzy‐logic systems (FLSs) have capable of can approximate unknown smooth nonlinear functions 8‐13 . With the help of these tools and the adaptive control, using NNs or FLSs to approximate unknown nonlinear terms of systems, the backstepping control design is developed to the uncertain nonlinear systems with various nonlinear features and removes these assumptions, such as dead‐zone, time‐delay, input saturation, backlash, hysteresis, see References 14‐32 and the references therein. For instance, by designing the Lyapunov–Krasovskii function to compensate the delay terms, an adaptive fuzzy backstepping control method was developed to the single‐input and single‐output (SISO) uncertain nonlinear system with time‐delay 19 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the help of these tools and the adaptive control, using NNs or FLSs to approximate unknown nonlinear terms of systems, the backstepping control design is developed to the uncertain nonlinear systems with various nonlinear features and removes these assumptions, such as dead‐zone, time‐delay, input saturation, backlash, hysteresis, see References 14‐32 and the references therein. For instance, by designing the Lyapunov–Krasovskii function to compensate the delay terms, an adaptive fuzzy backstepping control method was developed to the single‐input and single‐output (SISO) uncertain nonlinear system with time‐delay 19 . For handling the control problem of the uncertain nonlinear systems with unknown dead‐zone, an adaptive fuzzy control approach with the dead zone inverse method is addressed in Reference 20.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation