1998
DOI: 10.1577/1548-8675(1998)018<0832:oaapia>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observer Accuracy and Precision in Aerial and Foot Survey Counts of Pink Salmon in a Southeast Alaska Stream

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, we did not detect an effect of seed quantity on recovery rates of seeds. Multiple observers can represent a significant source of variability and nonrecovery of seeds can lead to negative biases in count data (Caughley 1974, Sauer et al 1994, Jones et al 1998). However, multiple observers are often required to collect data and process samples due to temporal or logistical limitations of field studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, we did not detect an effect of seed quantity on recovery rates of seeds. Multiple observers can represent a significant source of variability and nonrecovery of seeds can lead to negative biases in count data (Caughley 1974, Sauer et al 1994, Jones et al 1998). However, multiple observers are often required to collect data and process samples due to temporal or logistical limitations of field studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, doubling the abundance estimates of pink salmon (which is a common correction factor for peak count data; Jones and McPherson , Jones et al. ) prior to 1998 did not significantly affect our results. Given that pink salmon abundance estimates over the four decades of this system ranged from less than 1000 to over 100,000, we suggest that the signal‐to‐noise ratio of these data are robust to potential observation error and potential bias in pink salmon abundance estimates.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Populations with small effective sizes diverge more quickly than larger populations, and each of the Wood River system streams likely had a population size of <100 individuals based on field observations of their absolute numbers, which averaged fewer than 10 individuals per kilometre of habitat (Pess 2009). Process and observation error associated with visual surveys may have biased our estimates of Wood River system chum and Chinook salmon population sizes downward (see Jones et al 1998). Chum and Chinook salmon are larger-bodied and have distinct coloration from sockeye salmon, making them noticeable in the field, but they would have been missed if they arrived after the surveys.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%