2018
DOI: 10.1785/0220180120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observed Surface Disturbances Associated with the DPRK’s 3 September 2017 Underground Nuclear Test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Precise relative locations for the six explosions, with uncertainties on the order of a few hundred meters, have been determined by numerous seismic differential arrival time studies (e.g., Carluccio et al, ; Gibbons et al, , ; He et al, ; Myers et al, ; Murphy et al, ; Selby, ; Wang et al, ; Wen & Long, ; Yao et al, ; Zhang & Wen, ; Zhao et al, ; Zhao, Xie, He, et al, ). Absolute locations are much more difficult to resolve, and various strategies have been used to place the suite of precise relative locations in absolute position with respect to the source region topography, locations of tunnel portals, and/or deformation features on the surface inferred from InSAR or satellite photography (e.g., Murphy et al, ; Myers et al, ; Pabian & Coblentz, ; Pabian & Hecker, ; Patton & Pabian, ; Wei, ), with recent results having less than ~0.5‐km variations. The absence of collapse craters for all events complicates the absolute location process and indicates that burial depths for most events significantly exceed what is required for containment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Precise relative locations for the six explosions, with uncertainties on the order of a few hundred meters, have been determined by numerous seismic differential arrival time studies (e.g., Carluccio et al, ; Gibbons et al, , ; He et al, ; Myers et al, ; Murphy et al, ; Selby, ; Wang et al, ; Wen & Long, ; Yao et al, ; Zhang & Wen, ; Zhao et al, ; Zhao, Xie, He, et al, ). Absolute locations are much more difficult to resolve, and various strategies have been used to place the suite of precise relative locations in absolute position with respect to the source region topography, locations of tunnel portals, and/or deformation features on the surface inferred from InSAR or satellite photography (e.g., Murphy et al, ; Myers et al, ; Pabian & Coblentz, ; Pabian & Hecker, ; Patton & Pabian, ; Wei, ), with recent results having less than ~0.5‐km variations. The absence of collapse craters for all events complicates the absolute location process and indicates that burial depths for most events significantly exceed what is required for containment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the apparent DOB estimations for NKT2009–2016S are generally consistent with the height of Mount Mantap, the apparent DOB of NKT2017 is greater than the mountain's maximum height (~800 m) with respect to the tunnel's adit in which the tests were conducted. This result is reasonable for NKT2017 is likely detonated under the summit of Mount Mantap (e.g., Myers et al, ; Pabian & Coblentz, ). As strong surface disturbances caused by it have been observed, NKT2017's apparent DOB should be greater than its real DOB.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…According to this absolute location result, the last five Korean nuclear tests were detonated in the so‐called North tunnel in Murphy et al () and were located within a small area under Mount Mantap of the Punggye‐ri nuclear test site with a diameter of less than 1 km. With respect to the tunnel entrance, the maximum height of the test mountain is approximately 800 m. And it is covered by granite‐like hard rock except for the uppermost 200 m which is covered by volcanic deposits (Coblentz & Pabian, ; Pabian & Coblentz, ).…”
Section: Spectral Ratios Of Nkt2017 To Other Korean Nuclear Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…During and following the completion of the Venture, a number of novel data analyses have been undertaken, including those that dive deep into ground-based physical observations and measurements, those that use remotely sensed information in more informed ways to assess activities at a site, and those that integrate multiple data modalities. Some recent, provocative research suggests that geomorphometry, or quantitative land surface analysis, can provide insight into both the strength and integrity of rock masses at test sites (Coblentz and Pabian, 2015;Pabian and Coblentz, 2018). However, these studies related topography only to broad geology type, and not quantitative mechanical properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%