2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecresq.2006.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observed classroom quality profiles in state-funded pre-kindergarten programs and associations with teacher, program, and classroom characteristics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

17
162
0
20

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 304 publications
(199 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
17
162
0
20
Order By: Relevance
“…States vary in terms of income eligibility criteria and standards of quality, so it is not clear how availability of public pre-k might change associations between family income and child care quality. Pre-k programs also do not consistently meet levels of quality sufficient to promote children's development (Burchinal et al, 2008a;LoCasale-Crouch et al, 2007). Of particular concern is a finding that the lowest quality pre-k classroom profile was associated with classroom poverty level, indicating that children who are most educationally vulnerable due to poverty are least likely to receive the levels of instructional and emotional support to moderate their risk (LoCasale-Crouch et al, 2007;Pianta et al, 2005).…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…States vary in terms of income eligibility criteria and standards of quality, so it is not clear how availability of public pre-k might change associations between family income and child care quality. Pre-k programs also do not consistently meet levels of quality sufficient to promote children's development (Burchinal et al, 2008a;LoCasale-Crouch et al, 2007). Of particular concern is a finding that the lowest quality pre-k classroom profile was associated with classroom poverty level, indicating that children who are most educationally vulnerable due to poverty are least likely to receive the levels of instructional and emotional support to moderate their risk (LoCasale-Crouch et al, 2007;Pianta et al, 2005).…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Pre-k programs also do not consistently meet levels of quality sufficient to promote children's development (Burchinal et al, 2008a;LoCasale-Crouch et al, 2007). Of particular concern is a finding that the lowest quality pre-k classroom profile was associated with classroom poverty level, indicating that children who are most educationally vulnerable due to poverty are least likely to receive the levels of instructional and emotional support to moderate their risk (LoCasale-Crouch et al, 2007;Pianta et al, 2005). States with restrictive eligibility for pre-k (children at FPL or below) may increase access to quality for poor, but not low-income children, and therefore not address the fact that low-income children tend to be in the lowest quality care, on average.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most comprehensive picture of the quality of teacher-child interactions in pre-k classrooms and their effects on child outcomes stems from the extensive observations conducted through the National Center for Early Development and Learning's (NCEDL) Multi-state Study of Pre-kindergarten and the Statewide Early Education Programs study (SWEEP;LoCasale-Crouch et al, 2007;Mashburn et al, 2007; Pianta et al, 2003). Across the more than 700 state-funded pre-k classrooms sampled in 11 states, variation in teachers' use of instructionally and emotionally supportive interactions with children, as assessed by the CLASS (Pianta et al, in press) and Early Childhood Environmental Rating ScaleRevised (Harms, Clifford, & Cryer, 1998), were directly related to growth in children's achievement test scores and social behavior ratings over the pre-k year (Howes et al, 2008;Mashburn et al, 2007) and into kindergarten .…”
Section: Nih-pa Author Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Central to the MTP approach is that all observations of classroom interactions, as well as feedback and support to teachers, are based upon a shared, standardized framework for defining and observing classroom interactions, the Classroom Assessment Scoring System (CLASS; Pianta, La Paro, & Hamre, in press), which has been validated via links to growth in child outcomes within large-scale studies, many of which even isolate classroom effects from family influences Pianta, Belsky, Houts, Morrison, & NICHD ECCRN, 2007). This paper presents results from the first year of a two year experimental study of the effects of MTP support on changing the quality of teacherchild interactions in pre-k classrooms.The most comprehensive picture of the quality of teacher-child interactions in pre-k classrooms and their effects on child outcomes stems from the extensive observations conducted through the National Center for Early Development and Learning's (NCEDL) Multi-state Study of Pre-kindergarten and the Statewide Early Education Programs study (SWEEP;LoCasale-Crouch et al, 2007;Mashburn et al, 2007; Pianta et al, 2003). Across the more than 700 state-funded pre-k classrooms sampled in 11 states, variation in teachers' use of instructionally and emotionally supportive interactions with children, as assessed by the CLASS (Pianta et al, in press) and Early Childhood Environmental Rating ScaleRevised (Harms, Clifford, & Cryer, 1998), were directly related to growth in children's achievement test scores and social behavior ratings over the pre-k year (Howes et al, 2008;Mashburn et al, 2007) and into kindergarten .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, research has shown that although there is strong evidence of the effectiveness of EL support and instruction, it is rarely practiced in early childhood programs (Powell, Diamond, & Koehler, 2009). In addition, research has shown that some Early Childhood Education (ECE) professionals are limited in their awareness and knowledge of EL (LoCasale-Crouch et al, 2007;Powell, Diamond, Bojczyk, & Gerde, 2008) and that little instruction in EL, or any of the individual components of EL, is happening in preschool classrooms (Justice, Mashburn, Hamre, & Pianta, 2008). There is clearly a gap between research and practice of EL in ECE programs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%