2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.105708
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observed building damage patterns and foundation performance in Mexico City following the 2017 M7.1 Puebla-Mexico City earthquake

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, Zone II presents intermediate characteristics between Zones I and III. Further details of the Zones' characteristics are given by Franke et al (2019).…”
Section: The Earthquake Mexico City's Geotechnical Zones and The Buildingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, Zone II presents intermediate characteristics between Zones I and III. Further details of the Zones' characteristics are given by Franke et al (2019).…”
Section: The Earthquake Mexico City's Geotechnical Zones and The Buildingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The geographical distributions of damage of the 1985 and the 2017 events also highlight the fundamentally different effect of intraslab and interplate earthquakes in the Mexico City building environment. The 1985 Michoacan earthquake-interplate event-concentrated damage in structures located on the long period deposits of the lake-bed zone, whereas the 2017 Puebla-Morelos earthquake-intraslab event-affected buildings mainly located on the transition zone as depicted in Figure 4 of Franke et al (2019). Figure 7b shows that about 91% of the collapsed buildings were designed with a seismic code older than the 1987 Mexico's Federal District, which might imply that they were designed without proper ductile detailing as observed during the reconnaissance mission (e.g.…”
Section: Collapse Distribution and Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The geographical distributions of damage of the 1985 and the 2017 events also highlight the fundamentally different effect of intraslab and interplate earthquakes in the Mexico City building environment. The 1985 Michoacan earthquake—interplate event—concentrated damage in structures located on the long period deposits of the lake-bed zone, whereas the 2017 Puebla–Morelos earthquake—intraslab event—affected buildings mainly located on the transition zone as depicted in Figure 4 of Franke et al (2019).…”
Section: Collapse Distribution and Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Collapse and major structural damage was observed in on-site structures in some areas within the so-called lake, transition, and hill zones during the Puebla-Mexico 19 September 2017 earthquake (Asimaki et al, 2020; Franke et al, 2019; Mayoral et al, 2019a, 2019b, 2019c, 2019d; Montgomery et al, 2020; Roman et al, 2019; Wood et al, 2019). Overall, tunnel seismic performance was considered satisfactory; however, the tunnel discussed herein presented minor cracking in the primary lining (Figure 10).…”
Section: Observed Damagementioning
confidence: 99%