1961
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(61)91655-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observations on the Satellited Human Chromosomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

1967
1967
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 256 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This hypothesis is supported by the observation that most human Robertsonian translocations are dicentric (24,25). It has also been suggested that acrocentric chromosomes are more prone to nondisjunction because they are often associated with a common nucleolus (26)(27)(28). This view is supported by the observation of association at pachytene in the human spermatocyte (29) and oocyte (11).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…This hypothesis is supported by the observation that most human Robertsonian translocations are dicentric (24,25). It has also been suggested that acrocentric chromosomes are more prone to nondisjunction because they are often associated with a common nucleolus (26)(27)(28). This view is supported by the observation of association at pachytene in the human spermatocyte (29) and oocyte (11).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The presence of a chromatid exchange in the 'pulverized chromosome' has to be considered as an independent phenomenon (Piccotti and Chiarelli, unpublished). 800 x Associations between D and G chromosomes in man and chimpanzee A close association among the satellite bearing chromosomes of the D and G groups and the other ones carrying secondary constrictions in Man, Apes and Monkeys, has been shown by several authors (Edwards 1961; Ferguson- Smith & Handmaker 1961;Shaw 1961;Schneiderman & Smith 1962;Barton et al 1965;Zang & Back 1968;Cooke 1971;Patil and Lubs 1971;de Boer 1972;Ardito et al 1973;Nakagome 1973;Ardito & Mortelmans 1975). This preferential association has been assumed to be due to the accumulation of RNA produced by the nucleolar organizer regions, characteristic of these chromosomes.…”
Section: Evidence For the Non-random Distribution Of Chromosomes Durimentioning
confidence: 89%
“…A variety of observations in many different organisms indicates that the position of chromosomes is usually unvarying throughout interphase (BARR 1959;EvANS 1961;GRUMBACH.et al1963;MuLDAL et al 1963), as well as at mitosis (LUTZ 1916;WILSON 1928 and1932;EDWARDS 1961;FERGUSON-SMITH and HANDMAKER 1961;BARTON and DAVID 1962;MILLER et al1963a and b;MILLER 1964). These fixed positions of the chromosomes on the spindle, and their final positions in the daughter nuclei appear to be maintained from one mitosis to the next in plants and animals alike (AGAR 1920;KAGAWA 1926;WILSON 1928;LOVELESS and REVELL 1949).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include: pairing of homologous or nonhomologous chromosome segments, and fusion of chromosome segments into chromocenters (SwANSON 1957;SLIZYNSKI 1945;McCLINTOCK 1933 ); nuclear furrowing and nuclear budding (CROSBY LONGWELL and YERGANIAN 1965); delayed chromatid separation at anaphase (MELANDER 1962); aneuploidy and structural chromosome rearrangements (MILLER et al 1963a;MILLER 1964 ); fusion of nucleoli moving their respective organizer chromosomes together (McCLINTOCK 1934;GATES 1942;PENROSE and HARNDEN 1961;HANDMAKER 1961 andHAMERTON 1961;0HNO et al1961;SHAW 1961;LEHMANN and FORSSMAN 1962;MERRINGTON and PENROSE 1964 ). The displacement of chromosomes on the mitotic spindle, chromosome stickiness, laggard chromosomes, bridges, and generally prolonged time of metaphase that characterize many tumor cells (KOLLER 194 7;0BERLING and BERNHARD 1961) afford ample opportunity for a reorganization of the spatial relationships of the intranuclear chromosomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%