2016 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/asonam.2016.7752404
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observations on the role of influence in the difficulty of social network control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…however, this is not the only possible view of network control. More recent work within the network control domain (e.g., Runka, 2016;Runka and White, 2015a;McKenney and White, 2016) has considered the behavioural aspects present within many networked systems, directing the focus toward a more practical view of network control. This opens up the possibility of many different types of network control problems involving failure avoidance, the limitation of state change, or other control goals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…however, this is not the only possible view of network control. More recent work within the network control domain (e.g., Runka, 2016;Runka and White, 2015a;McKenney and White, 2016) has considered the behavioural aspects present within many networked systems, directing the focus toward a more practical view of network control. This opens up the possibility of many different types of network control problems involving failure avoidance, the limitation of state change, or other control goals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%