2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.106552
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observations on the influence of process and corrosion related defects on the fatigue strength of 316L stainless steel manufactured by Laser Powder Bed Fusion (L-PBF)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…LPBF process is known to cause many defects such as LoF or gas pores in the as-printed specimens. 7,34,36,41,50 In order to determine the proportion of defects in the microstructure, density measurements were carried out using Archimedes' method and X-ray tomography, and the results are shown in Table 3.…”
Section: Defect Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…LPBF process is known to cause many defects such as LoF or gas pores in the as-printed specimens. 7,34,36,41,50 In order to determine the proportion of defects in the microstructure, density measurements were carried out using Archimedes' method and X-ray tomography, and the results are shown in Table 3.…”
Section: Defect Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[28][29][30][31] The control of the microstructure allowed by the laser-scan strategy provides an interesting way to study the microstructural influence on fatigue. Numerous studies have reported the influence of energetic parameters on defect occurrence, 22,[32][33][34][35] and have investigated the impact of LPBF defects on fatigue behavior [36][37][38][39][40][41] ; however only few studies have investigated the microstructure-defect interplay using the laser-scan strategy as the controlling parameter. This new approach is full of interest because it allows to study the impact of specific microstructural characteristics such as grain shape and organization on the microstructure-defect interaction, which is not possible by varying the energetic parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fatigue failures of medical implants are both undesirable and well documented 1,2 . The decrease in fatigue strength of implant materials when exposed to corrosion conditions is equally well known 3,4 . There are, however, very few reports of in vitro simulations of the effect of body fluids on the fatigue characteristics of implants manufactured by AM or directed energy deposition (DED) techniques 5,6 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 The decrease in fatigue strength of implant materials when exposed to corrosion conditions is equally well known. 3,4 There are, however, very few reports of in vitro simulations of the effect of body fluids on the fatigue characteristics of implants manufactured by AM or directed energy deposition (DED) techniques. 5,6 Wegner et al 5 investigated laser powder bed fusion magnesium alloy implants in an in vitro environment, along with ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) and titanium implants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If there is some porous agglomeration or share of unmelted grains-there is a need to use the Murakami approach-that statement has been justified in the work by Liang et al [20] The authors found that multiple clustering defects act synergistically as one large defect, which easily initiates fatigue cracking. Another very important issue has been taken into account by Merot et al, [21] where the authors indicated that corrosion pits affect the fatigue strength of the material, and there is no specific influence of defect morphology (regardless of its type) on the crack initiation phenomenon. It is also very crucial to take into account geometrical features which certainly affect the notch sharpness, and degree of multiaxiality-such an approach has been tested by Wang et al [22] Based on a literature review related to the fatigue of AM materials, there are several visible factors that significantly affect the fatigue properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%