1949
DOI: 10.1176/ajp.105.12.889
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observations on the Histopathology of Schizophrenia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
1

Year Published

1949
1949
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In der vergleichsweise jungen Geschichte der biologischen Psychiatrie haben neuropathologische Untersuchungen die älteste und wohl kontroversenreichste Tradition. In der ersten Hälfte dieses Jahrhunderts erschienen mehr als 250 neuropathologische Untersuchungen an Gehirnen Schizophrener (Literaturübersichten: 14,15,56,62,67,89,91). Namhafte Beftirworter eines neuropathologischen Substrates schizophrener Erkrankungen waren die Vogts und deren Mitarbeiter, nach deren Auffassung vorwiegend im Tha-lamus und Neokortex Schizophrener sogenannte "Schwundzellen" (gekennzeichnet durch eigenartige Zytoplasmaauflösungen bei relativ gut erhaltenem Zellkern) und "Lückenfelder" (bedingt durch fokale NervenzellausHille) anzutreffen waren (3,23,32,34,84,85).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…In der vergleichsweise jungen Geschichte der biologischen Psychiatrie haben neuropathologische Untersuchungen die älteste und wohl kontroversenreichste Tradition. In der ersten Hälfte dieses Jahrhunderts erschienen mehr als 250 neuropathologische Untersuchungen an Gehirnen Schizophrener (Literaturübersichten: 14,15,56,62,67,89,91). Namhafte Beftirworter eines neuropathologischen Substrates schizophrener Erkrankungen waren die Vogts und deren Mitarbeiter, nach deren Auffassung vorwiegend im Tha-lamus und Neokortex Schizophrener sogenannte "Schwundzellen" (gekennzeichnet durch eigenartige Zytoplasmaauflösungen bei relativ gut erhaltenem Zellkern) und "Lückenfelder" (bedingt durch fokale NervenzellausHille) anzutreffen waren (3,23,32,34,84,85).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Inasmuch as it is unlikely that each of the pathologies presented in TABLES 2 and 3 represents a separate cause of schizophrenia, a major question is how many of these individual brains demonstrate significant deviations from the norm in more 69 Not found 70 Abnormal orientation of neurons 71 Not found 70,72 Decreased MAP 2, 5, in hippocampal subfields 73 Decreased synaptophysin mRNA 74 Decreased Glu R1 Glu R2 75 Entorhinal cortex: Abnormal architecture in 40% of cases 76,77 Not found 78 Thalamus: Decreased neurons in mediodorsal nucleus 79,80 Prefrontal and cingulate cortex: Upregulation of GABA A receptor binding 81,82 Decreased small neuron density 83 Increased neuron density 84 No change 88 Increased vertical axons cingulate cortex 86 Decreased GAD gene expression 85 Abnormal migration of NADPH cells 87,88 Association cortex: Increased GAP- 43 89 Gliosis: Periventricular, periaqueductal, subcortical 4,90,91 No glial increase in cortex, brain stem, thalamus, limbic structures 51,91,92 None in "purified" sample 53 Fibrin degradation products increased: possible marker for inflammation 93 than one domain. Unfortunately, few laboratories can conduct more than one or two assays in the same areas of the same brains.…”
Section: The Neuropathologies Of Schizophreniamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While many investigators believed that there was ample evidence to support this latter hypothesis (Josephy 1923;Vogt 1952;Winkelman and Book 1949), others insisted that the findings that had been reported were nonspecific in nature (Bamford and Bean 1932;Dunlap 1924;Spielmeyer 1930). More recent appraisals of these studies have concluded that all of these earlier investigations contained significant methodologicial flaws (Benes 1988).…”
Section: The Problem and The Datamentioning
confidence: 99%