2020
DOI: 10.1111/joa.13370
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observations on the growth of temporalis muscle: A 3D CT imaging study

Abstract: This study investigates the hypothesis that there is, during childhood, a disproportionate age-related expansion of the origin of temporalis muscle compared to the growth of the underlying skull. Lateral projections of 50 randomly selected 3D reformatted computerized tomographic (CT) scans (yielding 100 temporalis muscles) of children aged >0.6 to 15 years scanned for conditions that did not affect the shape of their head or face were windowed to provide the optimum delineation of temporalis muscle against the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where line a intersected line c (0.46 cm; 0.28–0.65) was not significantly different between right and left sides or when compared to measurements at the same levels taken from 50 unaffected subjects 10 (mean 0.46; range 0.28–0.65; and mean: 0.46; range 0.28–0.79, respectively).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…where line a intersected line c (0.46 cm; 0.28–0.65) was not significantly different between right and left sides or when compared to measurements at the same levels taken from 50 unaffected subjects 10 (mean 0.46; range 0.28–0.65; and mean: 0.46; range 0.28–0.79, respectively).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…When right and left sides were combined (n = 24), the mean vertical reach (distance b) of temporalis in unoperated MS patients (32.7 mm; standard error of mean [SEM] ± 1.7 mm) was significantly less (P = 0.0017) than that for 8 age-matched children (16 sides) from the study of normal subjects 10 (mean distance: 40.4 mm, SEM ± 1.32 mm).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations