Observations on the Chafer Grub Problem in the Lake District

Gray, Richard; Peet, W. V.; Rogerson, J. P.

doi:10.1017/s0007485300030509

Cited by 10 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Because females normally place eggs 4-10 em deep in the soil (Fleming 1972), early first-instar Japanese beetles likely feed initially on organic matter and fine roots. This behavior pattern has been reported in other scarab species (Gray et al 1947)_ The attractive or arrestant properties of turf grass roots to Japanese beetle grubs could not be ascertained at this stage in our study. The tendency of neonate Japanese beetles to be down in the soil profile may have important ramifications on timing of insecticide treatments and sampling if first instars have not yet moved to the soil-sod interface.…”

Section: Second Instarsupporting

confidence: 39%

Age-Dependent Movement Patterns of Japanese Beetle and European Chafer (Coleoptera: Scarabeidae) Grubs in Soil–Turfgrass Microcosms

Villani

Nyrop

1991

Environmental Entomology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Movement patterns of japanese beetle, Popillia japonica Newman, and European chafer, Rhizotrogus (Amphimallon) majalis (Razoumowsky),grubs as influenced by gravity, host plant position, and external disturbances were studied in laboratory soil-turfgrass microcosms. Second through third instars just before pupation were monitored using radiographic techniques. Neonates were monitored using destructive sampling. Results demonstrate significantly different movement patterns between species and among age groups. The development stage of the grub had a large effect on japanese beetle grub behavior and a measurable, but lesser effect, on European chafers. All larval stages of European chafers and all larval stages of japanese beetle, except neonates and postoverwintering third instars, displayed a downward movement in response to disturbance. Neonate japanese beetles showed little movement while postoverwintering. japanese beetles moved upward when disturbed. European chafer grubs of all age classes displayed random vertical movement with some arrestment in or near sod. Preoverwintering and postoverwintering third-instar chafers showed less dramatic arrestment behavior than other instars tested. Second-instar japanese beetles behaved similarly to European chafers; however, third instars behaved very differently. All third instars except those tested in late winter and early spring showed some innate downward movement in the soil microcosms. japanese beetles tested in late winter displayed random movement with some arrestment in sod, whereas those tested in early spring exhibited upward movement and arrestment in sod.

show abstract

Section: Second Instarsupporting

confidence: 39%

Age-Dependent Movement Patterns of Japanese Beetle and European Chafer (Coleoptera: Scarabeidae) Grubs in Soil–Turfgrass Microcosms

Villani

Nyrop

1991

Environmental Entomology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Spatial distribution of garden-chafer grubs is very patchy and irregular (Gray, Peet & Eogerson, 1947;Eaw, 1951). If the distribution in a field has been mapped by systematic sampling just before the flight season (to be dealt with in Part VIII of this series), it will be found that swarming is always confined very accurately to the infested areas of sward even when these show no obvious differences from the uninfested parts.…”

Section: Siting and Coherence Of The Swarmmentioning

confidence: 99%

Biology and ecology of the garden chafer, Phyllopertha horticola (L.). VII.—The flight season: male and female behaviour, and concluding discussion.

Milne

1960

Bull. Entomol. Res.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A general description of mass behaviour of the garden chafer, Phyllopertha horticola (L.), in the flight season was given earlier in this series (Milne, 1958). The outstanding features are two roughly equal and half-overlapping phases of activity: Phase 1, the swarming of the beetles over the grass sward, followed by Phase 2, the swarming on the surrounding bracken, hedges and trees. Investigation of sex proportions and mass reproductive state in the two phases permitted some deductions as to individual male and female behaviour (Milne, 1959a, b). In the present paper, further details of behaviour are given, and study of the flight season is concluded with a brief general discussion.

show abstract

“…Thomas & Heal (1944) show a detailed map of the grasslands damaged by garden chafer in North Wales during 1942-43. Gray, Peet & Eogerson (1947) do likewise for the Lake District during 1938-39. Eaw (1951) lists the major outbreak areas in Gloucestershire, Wiltshire, Somerset and Dorset during 1945-48.…”

Section: Geographical Distributionmentioning

confidence: 67%

“…No Mermithids were found in larvae from either the drier or wetter parts in any comparison of these parts. This is not surprising since Gray, Peet & Eogerson (1947) put infestation at a mere 0-54 per cent. (600 larvae examined 1938-39) while the number we ourselves encountered in much larger collections (14,860 larvae between 1948 and 1962) represented only 045 per cent.…”

Section: Enemies In the Drier And Wetter Parts Of Fell Grasslandmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Beginning in 1948, the present writer's observations on local distribution were made on infested fell farms in the English Lake District, mainly at Buttermere but also at Ambleside and Keswick. At Ambleside, the area included that studied by Gray, Peet & Eogerson (1947) namely, three fields (known as Target, the Breast and the Haggs) at Eydal (Crow How) Farm.…”

Section: Biology and Ecology Of The Gaeden Chafekmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Biology and ecology of the garden chafer,Phyllopertha horticola(L.). IX.—Spatial distribution

Milne

1964

Bull. Entomol. Res.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The garden chafer, Phyllopertha horticola (L.), has been recorded in most counties of England and Wales (43 out of 52) and is probably to be found in all. It is more abundant the warmer and wetter the region, i.e., it is more abundant in the west and south and most abundant in the south-west. It flourishes best in permanent pasture on light soil in hilly country, and occurs from sea-level to an altitude of at least 1,160 ft.Patchiness in local distribution was investigated on the pastures of fell farms in the Lake District.An infested fell pasture includes from one to five plant associations which are described as (1) Grass, (2) Sparse Bracken, (3) Bracken Bed, (4) Heath Rush and (5) Common Rush. Typically, all five are present in a pasture. The proportions of ground covered by grass turf (Agrostis-Festuca) in these associations are (1) 100 per cent., (2) 99 per cent., (3) 0 per cent., (4) 80 per cent, and (5) 50 per cent., the grass turf in the rush associations (4 & 5) filling the spaces between clumps of rushes. Soil stages of the garden chafer are found only in the grass turf and so the Bracken Bed association is never infested. In terms of density per unit area of ground, the other four associations exhibit the following relation between their infestations: Grass>Sparse Bracken>Heath Rush>Common Rush. This relation is only partly explained by the similar relation between proportions of ground covered by grass turf (see above). As to other factors that might be partly responsible, no correlation exists between botanical characteristics of grass turf and infestation but there are two negative correlations among physical characteristics which are suggestive: Grass and Sparse Bracken-<Heath Rush and Common Rush with respect to toughness of turf; and Grass<Sparse Bracken<Heath Rush<Common Rush with respect to wetness.Grassland, an unbroken expanse of grass sward, is, in the Lake District, by far the most important habitat since it carries by far the greatest part of the garden chafer population.In grassland no evidence was found of an association between density of soil stages and proximity to bracken.The population of any soil stage, from egg to pupa, is always much greater in drier than in wetter parts of grassland.Sampling at intervals within a generation indicated that the mortality rate is higher in the wetter parts of grassland. This is not due to any lack of food, or difficulty of utilising it, or to the presence of more enemies (competitors, predators, parasites and pathogens) in the wetter parts, but, as established by laboratory and field experiments, is attributable to a direct effect of moisture. Further experiments suggested that the egg stage is most and the feeding stages are least resistant to excessive moisture.Field experiments also indicated that the so-called ‘effective bee-liners’, females characterised by a direct and sustained flight from their roosting sites and that lay some eggs far afield, exercise some degree of discrimination in the choice of oviposition sites, the majority tending to choose the drier parts of grassland, the kind of site that does in fact, become more highly infested. Less than a quarter of all females become effective bee-liners and as such lay only about 15 per cent, of all eggs deposited by a population.There is a dynamic aspect to the phenomenon that population is greater in drier than wetter parts of grassland. Although population is always greater in the drier parts, the magnitude of the population ratio between drier and wetter parts can change considerably from one year to the next as a result of either excessive rain or excessive drought during the larval feeding period. The mechanism of such change is indicated.Spatial distribution on grassland was assessed statistically by employing Fisher's Coefficient of Dispersion. Eggs, and hence newly hatched larvae, are strongly aggregated. This strong degree of aggregation is gradually lessened, however, by the subsequent wanderings of the larvae in the course of feeding. Nevertheless, even in the final instar, larvae are still appreciably aggregated and hence so also are pupae. By the end of the feeding period, average dispersal from the hatching point is probably not more than 12 inches.Apart from proper food, which is provided by grassland, the most important living condition for the garden chafer in the soil appears to be proper soil moisture. Although actual limits have not been specified, survival clearly depends on the soil containing neither too much nor too little water for too long.As regards geographical distribution in England and Wales, the finding that the garden chafer is more abundant the warmer and wetter the climate is explained as follows. Females grow larger, and hence produce more eggs, where the larval feeding period is warmer, and more larvae survive where the climate is wetter, because the greater rainfall means less chance of too little water for an animal that has to live in freely draining soil to avoid too much water.Fundamentally, the patchy local distribution of the garden chafer is mainly a matter of the patchiness of soil-moisture conditions. The patchiness determined by these conditions is maintained and intensified by the reproductive behaviour of the adults.Accounts of other species in this and other countries suggest that, for pasture scarabs in general, soil moisture is the chief factor concerned in determining spatial distribution.

show abstract

Observations on the Chafer Grub Problem in the Lake District

Cited by 10 publications

References 5 publications

Age-Dependent Movement Patterns of Japanese Beetle and European Chafer (Coleoptera: Scarabeidae) Grubs in Soil–Turfgrass Microcosms

Age-Dependent Movement Patterns of Japanese Beetle and European Chafer (Coleoptera: Scarabeidae) Grubs in Soil–Turfgrass Microcosms

Biology and ecology of the garden chafer, Phyllopertha horticola (L.). VII.—The flight season: male and female behaviour, and concluding discussion.

Biology and ecology of the garden chafer,Phyllopertha horticola(L.). IX.—Spatial distribution

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About