1931
DOI: 10.1088/0959-5309/43/1/304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observations on percussion figures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1956
1956
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In her experiments on soda lime glass, 25 Tillett measured a 2.5 higher threshold in impact conditions than in static indentation : A static = 6.1 10 4 N/m, and A dynamic = 1.5 10 5 N/m. This dynamic Auerbach's constant was nearly the same as that found in the 1930's by Andrews 26 and Longchambon, 27 also on soda lime glass from diverse providers. A set of impact experiments was later performed by Chaudhri and Brophy with Tungsten Carbide projectiles onto fused silica.…”
Section: Fractures At Surfaces : From Auerbach To High Power Laserssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…In her experiments on soda lime glass, 25 Tillett measured a 2.5 higher threshold in impact conditions than in static indentation : A static = 6.1 10 4 N/m, and A dynamic = 1.5 10 5 N/m. This dynamic Auerbach's constant was nearly the same as that found in the 1930's by Andrews 26 and Longchambon, 27 also on soda lime glass from diverse providers. A set of impact experiments was later performed by Chaudhri and Brophy with Tungsten Carbide projectiles onto fused silica.…”
Section: Fractures At Surfaces : From Auerbach To High Power Laserssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…In these studies, the most dominant aspect of the damage was the Hertzian cone cracking. Early studies of cone cracking in inorganic glasses by impact with hard spheres were made by Raman [11], Benerji [12] and Andrews [13]. Interestingly, all these authors [11][12][13] suggested confidently that the impactgenerated cone cracking was due to the shear stresses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early studies of cone cracking in inorganic glasses by impact with hard spheres were made by Raman [11], Benerji [12] and Andrews [13]. Interestingly, all these authors [11][12][13] suggested confidently that the impactgenerated cone cracking was due to the shear stresses. However, this view is not now generally held and it is widely accepted that cone cracking is due to the surface radial tensile stress at the circle of contact between the sphere and the target, generated by the impact.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%