2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ic.2010.11.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observations on complete sets between linear time and polynomial time

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, for any oracle A satisfying LIN A =NLIN A = DTIME A (n), as it was given by Proposition 15 in [10], it follows that both ¬ H A (n) and ¬ G A (n) hold, as well as ¬ H A (f ) and ¬ G A (f ) for any time-constructible bound f . Hence G(f ) and H(f ) do not relativize if they hold.…”
Section: Definition 4 (Subhomogeneity) a Functionmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, for any oracle A satisfying LIN A =NLIN A = DTIME A (n), as it was given by Proposition 15 in [10], it follows that both ¬ H A (n) and ¬ G A (n) hold, as well as ¬ H A (f ) and ¬ G A (f ) for any time-constructible bound f . Hence G(f ) and H(f ) do not relativize if they hold.…”
Section: Definition 4 (Subhomogeneity) a Functionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The hardness of this problem was emphasized by showing that H(n) does not relativize. We want to recall this result from [10], since it marks the starting point of the present investigations. Moreover, we shall come back to relativizations at the end of this paper.…”
Section: Basic Notions and Results Around The Hierarchy Propertymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations