1978
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-9365(78)80024-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observations on Bristle- and Scale-Production in Mallomonas caudata (Chrysophyceae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

1981
1981
1992
1992

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the proximal end the shaft is flattened and obliquely angled to form the attachment to the scale. The transformation of this flattened attachment into the hollow shaft of the plume strongly suggests that the whole plume is formed by the rolling-up of a flat structure, as reported for the bristles of M. caudata (Wujek & Kristiansen, 1978). It seems likely that the plume-bristles are homologous with the bristles of the body scales.…”
Section: Electron Microscopysupporting
confidence: 53%
“…At the proximal end the shaft is flattened and obliquely angled to form the attachment to the scale. The transformation of this flattened attachment into the hollow shaft of the plume strongly suggests that the whole plume is formed by the rolling-up of a flat structure, as reported for the bristles of M. caudata (Wujek & Kristiansen, 1978). It seems likely that the plume-bristles are homologous with the bristles of the body scales.…”
Section: Electron Microscopysupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Silica scale formation has been documented for Synura and Mallomonas (Belcher, 1969;Schnepf & Deichgr/iber, 1969;Wujek & Kristiansen, 1978;McGrory & Leadbeater, 1981;Leadbeater, 1986Leadbeater, , 1990Beech, Wetherbee & Pickett-Heaps, 1990) and follows the same basic steps in the two genera, any differences being concerned with the ornamentation of the scale and the additional production of bristles in Mallomonas. Schnepf & Deichgr/iber (1969) believed that the silica deposition vesicle is produced by fusion of small vesicles from the Golgi apparatus but Wujek & Kristiansen (1978) claimed that the SDV is also partly formed by material budding off from the chloroplast ER.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Schnepf & Deichgr/iber (1969) believed that the silica deposition vesicle is produced by fusion of small vesicles from the Golgi apparatus but Wujek & Kristiansen (1978) claimed that the SDV is also partly formed by material budding off from the chloroplast ER. This seems to have been disproved by Mignot & Brugerolle (1982) who demonstrated that the vesicle membrane has a positive reaction when treated with the PATAg technique of Thiery & Rambourg (1974), while the chloroplast ER shows a negative reaction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations