2021
DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/abf0b0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observations of the Quiet Sun during the Deepest Solar Minimum of the Past Century with Chandrayaan-2 XSM: Sub-A-class Microflares outside Active Regions

Abstract: Solar flares, with energies ranging over several orders of magnitude, result from impulsive release of energy due to magnetic reconnection in the corona. Barring a handful, almost all microflares observed in X-rays are associated with the solar active regions. Here we present, for the first time, a comprehensive analysis of a large sample of quiet-Sun microflares observed in soft X-rays by the Solar X-ray Monitor (XSM) on board the Chandrayaan-2 mission during the 2019–2020 solar minimum. A total of 98 microfl… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
34
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
3
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So, we calculated the maximum possible total energy of the type I bursts as E t ≈ 5×7×3600×8.1×10 22 14×14 ≈ 5.3×10 25 erg. This is in reasonable agreement with the range of energies (3×10 26 -7×10 27 erg) for the soft X-ray microflares reported by Vadawale et al (2021) since the authors had mentioned that their estimates represent upper limits. Note that the minimum possible energy of the type I bursts in the present case is E ≈ 8.1×10 22 erg.…”
Section: Analysis and Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…So, we calculated the maximum possible total energy of the type I bursts as E t ≈ 5×7×3600×8.1×10 22 14×14 ≈ 5.3×10 25 erg. This is in reasonable agreement with the range of energies (3×10 26 -7×10 27 erg) for the soft X-ray microflares reported by Vadawale et al (2021) since the authors had mentioned that their estimates represent upper limits. Note that the minimum possible energy of the type I bursts in the present case is E ≈ 8.1×10 22 erg.…”
Section: Analysis and Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Here n th is the number density of the background thermal electrons, n is the number density of the non-thermal electrons, V is the volume of the burst source, and E m is the mean energy of the individual electrons. In the present case n th = 7.9×10 7 cm −3 and E m ≈ 5 keV (Vadawale et al 2021). Assuming n/n th = 1.23×10 −7 at 80 MHz (Thejappa & Kundu 1991) and V = 10 30 cm 3 (corresponding to a density scale height of ≈ 10 10 cm in the solar corona), we find E ≈ 7.8×10 22 erg.…”
Section: Analysis and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 49%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As detailed observations have been lacking, it is not clear if the evolution of these smaller events follows the standard flare model. It is only recently, with the advent of better instrumentation, that in-depth studies of smaller flares are becoming feasible (Kuhar et al 2018;Mitra-Kraev and Del Zanna 2019;Athiray et al 2020;Cooper et al 2020;Glesener et al 2020;Duncan et al 2021;Vadawale et al 2021a). Lately, using X-ray time resolved spectroscopy, Narendranath et al (2020) have carried out abundance studies of flares as small as GOES B9-class.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microflares have energies about 10 26 -10 28 erg and are identified to have <10 −6 W m −2 GOES (1-8 Å) soft X-ray flux, labelled as B, A, and sub-A class flares (Lin et al 1984;Fletcher et al 2011;Hannah et al 2011). Sub-A class microflares are not reliably detected by GOES but sub-A level events have been observed by more sensitive full-disk X-ray spectrometers identified to be located in the quiet Sun (Sylwester et al 2012;Vadawale et al 2021a) and ARs (Gburek et al 2011;Vadawale et al 2021b). However, a GOES equivalent class for sub-A class microflares can be calculated from their temperature and emission measure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%