Observations of the global epidemiology of COVID-19 from the prepandemic period using web-based surveillance: a cross-sectional analysis

Abstract

Background Scant data are available about global patterns of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) spread and global epidemiology of early confirmed cases of COVID-19 outside mainland China. We describe the global spread of SARS-CoV-2 and characteristics of COVID-19 cases and clusters before the characterisation of COVID-19 as a pandemic. Methods Cases of COVID-19 reported between Dec 31, 2019, and March 10, 2020 (ie, the prepandemic period), were identified daily from official websites, press releases, press conference transcripts, and social media feeds of national ministries of health or other government agencies. Case characteristics, travel history, and exposures to other cases were abstracted. Countries with at least one case were classified as affected. Early cases were defined as those among the first 100 cases reported from each country. Later cases were defined as those after the first 100 cases. We analysed reported travel to affected countries among the first case reported from each country outside mainland China, demographic and exposure characteristics among cases with age or sex information, and cluster frequencies and sizes by transmission settings. Findings Among the first case reported from each of 99 affected countries outside of mainland China, 75 (76%) had recent travel to affected countries; 60 (61%) had travelled to China, Italy, or Iran. Among 1200 cases with age or sex information, 874 (73%) were early cases. Among 762 early cases with age information, the median age was 51 years (IQR 35–63); 25 (3%) of 762 early cases occurred in children younger than 18 years. Overall, 21 (2%) of 1200 cases were in health-care workers and none were in pregnant women. 101 clusters were identified, of which the most commonly identified transmission setting was households (76 [75%]; mean 2·6 cases per cluster [range 2–7]), followed by non-health-care occupational settings (14 [14%]; mean 4·3 cases per cluster [2–14]), and community gatherings (11 [11%]; mean 14·2 cases per cluster [4–36]). Interpretation Cases with travel links to China, Italy, or Iran accounted for almost two-thirds of the first reported COVID-19 cases from affected countries. Among cases with age information available, most were among adults aged 18 years and older. Although there were many clusters of household transmission among early cases, clusters in occupational or community settings tended to be larger, supporting a possible role for physical distancing to slow the progression of SARS-CoV-2 spread. Funding None.

Association between ABO blood groups and susceptibility to COVID-19: profile of age and gender in Iraqi patients

“…Consistent with these findings, a Brazilian study reported that 57.5% of 67, 180 cases were males [31]. On the contrary, most of epidemiological reviews and meta-analysis studies reported comparable rates of COVID-19 between males and females, but males tended to have higher fatality and mortality rates than females [5,6,32]. Vulnerability of men for worse outcomes of COVID-19 is probably due to gender-based immunological differences between men and women, and this may impact the woman ability to resist infections including COVID-19 [33].…”

Obesity and COVID‐19 in Latin America: A tragedy of two pandemics—Official document of the Latin American Federation of Obesity Societies

“…This led to a spreading underdiagnosis of cases and deaths in the region, due to poor testing rates, poor‐quality death certificates, low system integration and political reasons 3 . The fatality rate varies tremendously among countries and is related to different criteria for testing and as a consequence of different levels of underdiagnosis 2,5,30 . In this context, excess deaths could be a useful tool for the overall burden of the pandemics.…”

“…While the epidemic started in Asia, the epicenter of the pandemic moved gradually to Europe and North America. During June and July, it expanded into Latin America (LA) 2 . In August, Brazil, Mexico, Peru, Colombia and Chile were among the 10 countries with the most confirmed cases in the world, with still growing numbers.…”

Leveraging Network Science for Social Distancing to Curb Pandemic Spread

“…There is a consensus in the scientific community regarding the possibility of contagion mitigation through the use of face coverings, personal hygiene, and by avoiding crowded and poorly ventilated places [6]. The clusters of infected populations were shown to be more likely in occupational or community settings, lending further credence to the significance of physical distancing [7]. The white collar jobs are relying on workfrom-home and virtual communication, while the blue collar workers are being advised to abide by the 6 feet distance rule.…”