2002
DOI: 10.1029/2001jc000970
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observations of nearshore infragravity waves: Seaward and shoreward propagating components

Abstract: [1] The variation of seaward and shoreward infragravity energy fluxes across the shoaling and surf zones of a gently sloping sandy beach is estimated from field observations and related to forcing by groups of sea and swell, dissipation, and shoreline reflection. Data from collocated pressure and velocity sensors deployed between 1 and 6 m water depth are combined, using the assumption of cross-shore propagation, to decompose the infragravity wave field into shoreward and seaward propagating components. Seawar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
121
0
4

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(132 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(40 reference statements)
7
121
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Contributions from forced, or group bound, waves that shoal proportional to a theoretical maximum h À5 ratio [Longuet-Higgins and Stewart, 1962] are small everywhere except the surfzone. Also similar to previous results, the relative contribution of seaward propagating leaky waves (with depth dependence h À1/2 ) is estimated to be a significant portion of the total infragravity energy [Sheremet et al, 2002].…”
Section: Cross-shore Energy Ratiossupporting
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Contributions from forced, or group bound, waves that shoal proportional to a theoretical maximum h À5 ratio [Longuet-Higgins and Stewart, 1962] are small everywhere except the surfzone. Also similar to previous results, the relative contribution of seaward propagating leaky waves (with depth dependence h À1/2 ) is estimated to be a significant portion of the total infragravity energy [Sheremet et al, 2002].…”
Section: Cross-shore Energy Ratiossupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Assuming nearly shore-normal linear wave propagation close to shore, the total seaward energy flux F( f ) is estimated at each infragravity frequency f using the observations of pressure (P) and cross-shore (U) and alongshore (V) velocities as [Sheremet et al, 2002] …”
Section: Initializationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The numerical results show that important features of the time frequency shape of wave dissipation (Figure 3) are due to nonlinear interactions; the peak of the dissipation distribution follows the spectral peak because of transfer of energy toward both the infragravity band, and high frequencies; narrower distributions of dissipation rate occur when nonlinear interaction is stronger, e.g., for larger waves. Growth rates in the infragravity band are exclusively due to transfer of energy from the spectral peak, an essentially nonlinear process [Sheremet et al, 2002].…”
Section: Inverse Modeling Of Bottom Mud Statementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owing to the steep beach profile, shoreward (+) and seaward (−) energy, E, from the co-located pressure and ADCP velocities (2nd bin from the bottom) was computed as: (4) where Co represents the co-spectrum, f is frequency, x is cross-shore location, k is radian wave number, z is instrument height, h is water depth, ω is radian wave frequency, and subscripts u and p represent cross-shore velocity and pressure (Tatavarti et al 1988, Sheremet et al 2002. The energy flux, F, is defined as:…”
Section: Wave Reflectionmentioning
confidence: 99%