Observations of MeV electrons in Jupiter's innermost radiation belts and polar regions by the Juno radiation monitoring investigation: Perijoves 1 and 3
Abstract:Juno's “Perijove 1” (27 August 2016) and “Perijove 3” (11 December 2016) flybys through the innermost region of Jupiter's magnetosphere (radial distances <2 Jovian radii, 1.06 RJ at closest approach) provided the first in situ look at this region's radiation environment. Juno's Radiation Monitoring Investigation collected particle counts and noise signatures from penetrating high‐energy particle impacts in images acquired by the Stellar Reference Unit and Advanced Stellar Compass star trackers, and the Jupiter… Show more
“…Since JEDI can directly detect electrons to about 1.2 MeV, the discussion above suggests that electrons in the beam with energies between 1 and 15 MeV are not uncommon. This seems to agree well with the radiation monitoring system analysis of >5 and >10 MeV electrons presented in Becker et al (), see below. Our analysis does not extend to a more rigorous accounting of the likely energy spread at each time.…”
Section: Observations Of Energetic Upward Beamssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The band around 160 keV offers some guidance that these beams must contain high energy components. Additionally, radiation monitoring data presented by Becker et al () show a period of >10 MeV electrons that agrees well with the times of the intense beam predicted by JEDI on the inbound leg of PJ3.…”
Juno's Jupiter Energetic particle Detector Instrument often detects energetic electron beams over Jupiter's polar regions. In this paper, we document a subset of intense magnetic field‐aligned beams of energetic electrons moving away from Jupiter at high magnetic latitudes both north and south of the planet. The number fluxes of these beams are often dominated by electrons with energies above about 1 MeV. These very narrow beams can create broad angular responses in the Jupiter Energetic particle Detector Instrument with unique signatures in the detector count rates, probably because of >10 MeV electrons. We use these signatures to identify the most intense beams. These beams occur primarily above the swirl region of the polar cap aurora. This polar region is described as being of low brightness and high absorption and the most magnetically “open” at Jupiter.
“…Since JEDI can directly detect electrons to about 1.2 MeV, the discussion above suggests that electrons in the beam with energies between 1 and 15 MeV are not uncommon. This seems to agree well with the radiation monitoring system analysis of >5 and >10 MeV electrons presented in Becker et al (), see below. Our analysis does not extend to a more rigorous accounting of the likely energy spread at each time.…”
Section: Observations Of Energetic Upward Beamssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The band around 160 keV offers some guidance that these beams must contain high energy components. Additionally, radiation monitoring data presented by Becker et al () show a period of >10 MeV electrons that agrees well with the times of the intense beam predicted by JEDI on the inbound leg of PJ3.…”
Juno's Jupiter Energetic particle Detector Instrument often detects energetic electron beams over Jupiter's polar regions. In this paper, we document a subset of intense magnetic field‐aligned beams of energetic electrons moving away from Jupiter at high magnetic latitudes both north and south of the planet. The number fluxes of these beams are often dominated by electrons with energies above about 1 MeV. These very narrow beams can create broad angular responses in the Jupiter Energetic particle Detector Instrument with unique signatures in the detector count rates, probably because of >10 MeV electrons. We use these signatures to identify the most intense beams. These beams occur primarily above the swirl region of the polar cap aurora. This polar region is described as being of low brightness and high absorption and the most magnetically “open” at Jupiter.
“…The main difference between the MWR data and our simulations is a discrepancy in the brightness profiles (up to a factor of 3). The discrepancies between the data and simulations, combined with Juno's field and particle measurements [see, e.g., Bolton et al, 2017, Becker et al, 2017b, confirm that physical conditions close to the planet affecting synchrotron emission (electron energy spectra, pitch angle distributions, and the magnetic environment) are different than we anticipated. Model improvements and results on polarization will be the topic of a follow-up paper.…”
mentioning
confidence: 50%
“…Another challenge is related to the fact that the radiation depends on the electron energy spectrum and scales in proportion to B × N (equations (1)- (4)). Large errors in our simulations can then be easily introduced from small uncertainties on B and N. Juno's first perijoves have confirmed strong discrepancies between magnetic and particle measurements and models, with differences of ∼2-3 Gauss for the magnetic field and by up to an order of magnitude for the particle observations [Bolton et al, 2017;Becker et al 2017b]. Knowing the current inaccuracy of magnetic field and electron distributions at Jupiter inside 1.5 R J and the fact that the synchrotron radiation is highly beamed, our simulations of polarized radiation are indeed difficult to both carry out and validate (which are the focus of ongoing modeling work).…”
Section: Preliminary Data Analysis and Model Comparisonsmentioning
Since August 2016, measurements of Jupiter's microwave emissions at six wavelengths ranging from 1.3 cm to 50 cm have been made with the Juno Microwave Radiometer. In this paper, we introduce the first systematic set of in situ observations of synchrotron radiation in a polar plane while describing the modeling approach we use to analyze this data (collected 27 August 2016). Time series of brightness profiles at all six frequencies present similarities that are explained by the presence of known regions of intense synchrotron radiation. Our model predictions, though limited for now to the total intensity of the radiation, reproduce (qualitatively) the observation of temporal variations and allow to disentangle the synchrotron emission from the atmospheric emission. The discrepancies seen between the data and simulations confirm that physical conditions close to Jupiter affecting synchrotron emission (electron energy spectra, pitch angle distributions, and the magnetic environment) are different than we anticipated.
“…This changing geometry of the orbit provides a unique opportunity to sample a range of magnetospheric regions as well as view the planet from different angles. While the radiation environment on first passes has been somewhat weaker than anticipated [ Becker et al, ], the spacecraft will begin to dip deeper into the population of >10 MeV electrons that are trapped in Jupiter's strong magnetic field. These first glimpses of Jupiter from Juno gathered in this special issue suggest that the next couple years will provide much to think about.…”
Preliminary results from NASA's Juno mission are presented in this special issue of Geophysical Research Letters. The data were gathered by nine scientific instruments as the Juno spacecraft approached Jupiter on the dawn flank, was inserted into Jupiter orbit on 4 July 2016, and made the first polar passes close to the planet. The first results hint that Jupiter may not have a distinct core, indicate puzzling deep atmospheric convection, and reveal complex small‐scale structure in the magnetic field and auroral processes that are distinctly different from those at Earth.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.