2008
DOI: 10.1175/2007jcli1809.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observations of Large-Scale Ocean–Atmosphere Interaction in the Southern Hemisphere

Abstract: The authors provide a detailed examination of observed ocean-atmosphere interaction in the Southern Hemisphere (SH). Focus is placed on the observed relationships between variability in SH extratropical sea surface temperature (SST) anomalies, the Southern Annular Mode (SAM), and the El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO). Results are examined separately for the warm (November-April) and cold (May-October) seasons and for monthly and weekly time scales. It is shown that the signatures of the SAM and ENSO in the S… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

19
118
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(137 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(61 reference statements)
19
118
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The spatial pattern of SST anomalies associated with the high index polarity of the AAO (warm SST anomalies in the middle latitudes and cold SST anomalies in the high latitudes) bear strong resemblance to the structure of the first SST EOF mode. This indicates that the AAO is the dominant mechanism responsible for the dominant SST variability in the Southern Ocean in the unforced control experiment, which is also consistent with previous observational and modeling studies (14)(15)(16). CCSM3 provides two ensemble members for 20C3M, that is forced with the observed anthropogenic and natural forcings.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The spatial pattern of SST anomalies associated with the high index polarity of the AAO (warm SST anomalies in the middle latitudes and cold SST anomalies in the high latitudes) bear strong resemblance to the structure of the first SST EOF mode. This indicates that the AAO is the dominant mechanism responsible for the dominant SST variability in the Southern Ocean in the unforced control experiment, which is also consistent with previous observational and modeling studies (14)(15)(16). CCSM3 provides two ensemble members for 20C3M, that is forced with the observed anthropogenic and natural forcings.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The 5.5% of the data area that is inconsistent in the observed case is close to the median of this range of area values, indicating the differences are not field significant. Inconsistent trends in the midlatitude Southern Hemisphere strongly resemble the surface temperature pattern of the negative phase of the SAM (Ciasto and Thompson 2008), which did indeed show a negative trend in the last decade.…”
Section: S20mentioning
confidence: 60%
“…3). The cold season SIC dipole is also observed to be considerably stronger in magnitude than its warm season counterpart, a difference that may be related to the enhancement of air-sea heat fluxes during the cold season months (Ciasto and Thompson 2008). These anomalous heat fluxes will, in turn, enhance the perturbations of an SST field already near the freezing point, and thus already primed for sea ice growth.…”
Section: Interannual Sic Variability a Climatological Features Of Sementioning
confidence: 92%
“…For example, evaluation of the relationships between SIC and the SAM/ENSO have generally focused on annual time scales or particular seasons of sea ice growth and decline. Given that the SH atmospheric circulation and mixed layer ocean associated with the SAM and ENSO vary as a function of season (Ciasto and Thompson 2008), it is of interest to examine how interannual associations with SIC evolve over a full seasonal cycle. Moreover, the asymmetry of sea ice responses to positive and negative phases of the SAM/ ENSO remains little explored, and further questions remain in regard to the leading patterns of SIC variability and their relation to the leading patterns of climate variability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%