1972
DOI: 10.1038/physci239123a0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observations of Cygnus X-3 by Uhuru

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
57
0
1

Year Published

1974
1974
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
57
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It shows a strong 4.8 h modulation in the X-ray (Parsignault et al 1972) and the infra-red emission which is attributed to the binary orbital motion (Becklin et al 1973). The measurement of the radial velocity in the infra-red band and its interpretation as due to binary Doppler shift has led to the derivation of a large mass function for the source (Schmutz et al 1996), but this simplistic explanation of the He II line shift is strongly disputed by the relative phasing of the infra-red and the X-ray binary modulation (van Kerkwijk 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It shows a strong 4.8 h modulation in the X-ray (Parsignault et al 1972) and the infra-red emission which is attributed to the binary orbital motion (Becklin et al 1973). The measurement of the radial velocity in the infra-red band and its interpretation as due to binary Doppler shift has led to the derivation of a large mass function for the source (Schmutz et al 1996), but this simplistic explanation of the He II line shift is strongly disputed by the relative phasing of the infra-red and the X-ray binary modulation (van Kerkwijk 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distance of the object is 8-12.5 kpc with an absorption on the line of sight A V ∼ 20 mag (van Kerkwijk et al 1996). The flux modulation at a period of 4.8 hours, first discovered in X-rays (Parsignault 1972), then at near infrared wavelengths (Becklin et al 1973), and observed simultaneously at X-ray and near-IR wavelengths by Mason et al (1986), is believed to be the orbital period of the binary system. Following infrared spectroscopic measurements (van Kerkwijk et al 1992), where WR-like features have been detected in I and K band spectra, the nature of the mass-donating star is suggested to be a Wolf-Rayet-like star, but an unambiguous classification, similar to the other WR stars, is still lacking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its X-ray lightcurve (Parsignault et al 1972) shows strong 4.8-hour orbital modulation and the infrared lightcurve (Mason et al 1986) weaker modulation, typical of low-mass XRBs. However, infrared observations suggest that its mass-donating companion is a Wolf-Rayet (WR) star (van Kerkwijk et al 1992), which would make it a high-mass XRB.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%