2019
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab1f8f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observations of CH3OH and CH3CHO in a Sample of Protostellar Outflow Sources

Abstract: IRAM 30 m Observations toward eight protostellar outflow sources were taken in the 96–176 GHz range. Transitions of CH3OH and CH3CHO were detected in seven of them. The integrated emissions of the transitions of each species that fell into the observed frequency range were measured and fit using RADEX and LTE models. Column densities and gas properties inferred from this fitting are presented. The ratio of the A and E-type isomers of CH3OH indicates that the methanol observed in these outflows was formed on th… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We attribute this difference to the fact that the single-dish observations of IRAS 4A by Holdship et al (2019) include emission from a much larger region (including some from the central protostars) with respect to that probed by the present SOLIS observations. Moreover Holdship et al (2019) do not explicitly derive the emitting size, even though they minimize with respect to this parameter; since the maximization is done independently for each species, their column density ratio has a relatively large intrinsic uncertainty. Therefore, the interferometric images allow us to minimize the risk of mixing different gas components (typical of shocked regions).…”
Section: Moleculementioning
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We attribute this difference to the fact that the single-dish observations of IRAS 4A by Holdship et al (2019) include emission from a much larger region (including some from the central protostars) with respect to that probed by the present SOLIS observations. Moreover Holdship et al (2019) do not explicitly derive the emitting size, even though they minimize with respect to this parameter; since the maximization is done independently for each species, their column density ratio has a relatively large intrinsic uncertainty. Therefore, the interferometric images allow us to minimize the risk of mixing different gas components (typical of shocked regions).…”
Section: Moleculementioning
confidence: 59%
“…Unfortunately, there are very few observations of iCOMs in low-mass protostellar shocks. To our knowledge, iCOMs other than methanol have been detected only toward a handful of objects: several iCOMs toward L1157-B1 (Arce et al 2008;Lefloch et al 2017), formamide toward L1157-B2 (Mendoza et al 2014), acetaldehyde toward IRAS 2A and IRAS 4A (Holdship et al 2019), and acetaldehyde and dimethyl ether toward SMM4-W (Öberg et al 2011). However, it is worth noting that all these works refer to single-dish observations at relatively low spatial angular resolution and are, by definition, unable to disentangle the different spatial distribution of iCOMs caused by the age of the shocks, so that the method described above cannot be used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Original Research By Young Twinkle Students (ORBYTS) is an educational programme in which secondary school pupils work on original research linked to the Twinkle Space Mission under the tuition of PhD students and other young scientists (McKemmish et al 2017a). Previous projects have included calculating accurate molecular transition frequencies (Chubb et al 2018;McKemmish et al 2017b;Darby-Lewis et al 2019), studying planetary aurorae (Wibisono et al 2020) and spectral studies of the composition of protostellar regions (Holdship et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Large COM species, such as propylene (CH 2 CHCH 3 ), acetaldehyde (CH 3 CHO), dimethyl ether (CH 3 OCH 3 ), or methyl formate (CH 3 OCHO), have been found in the gas-phase toward dark cloud cores and starless/prestellar cores (Marcelino et al 2007;Öberg et al 2010;Bacmann et al 2012;Cernicharo et al 2012;Vastel et al 2014;Jiménez-Serra et al 2016;Soma et al 2018;Agúndez et al 2019;Yoshida et al 2019;Scibelli & Shirley 2020). These observations have triggered a plethora of theoretical and experimental studies to understand COM formation at low temperatures (see e.g., Rawlings et al 2013;Vasyunin & Herbst 2013;Balucani et al 2015;Ivlev et al 2015;Ruaud et al 2015;Chuang et al 2016;Quénard et al 2018;Shingledecker et al 2018;Holdship et al 2019;Jin & Garrod 2020), although no consensus has been reached yet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%