2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2006.05.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observations of casein micelles in skim milk concentrate by transmission electron microscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
29
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
4
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of Martin et al (2010), obtained by PCS methods, were consistent with those obtained through TEM by Karlsson et al (2007) using three different sample preparation steps. Both studies were also consistent with (McKenna, 2000), who utilized electron microscopy and reported no change in casein micelle size distribution under conditions of UF.…”
Section: The Effect Of Uf and Df On Casein Micelle Size Distributionssupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results of Martin et al (2010), obtained by PCS methods, were consistent with those obtained through TEM by Karlsson et al (2007) using three different sample preparation steps. Both studies were also consistent with (McKenna, 2000), who utilized electron microscopy and reported no change in casein micelle size distribution under conditions of UF.…”
Section: The Effect Of Uf and Df On Casein Micelle Size Distributionssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Some studies reported that casein micelle size appeared to be unchanged, while others reported increased or decreased sizes. Karlsson et al (2007) reported no observable changes in casein micelle size when UF retentate was observed under TEM, using three different preparation techniques, though it was must be noted that any TEM preparation (and virtually any microscopy preparation) may itself interfere with sample size. Singh (2007), utilizing electron microscopy, reported an increase in micelle size during the course of UF.…”
Section: The Effect Of Uf and Df On Casein Micelle Size Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The very minor differences (<3 nm) in the measured micelle size of the three samples were not significant relative to the uncertainty of the measurements. Results of previous studies have been inconsistent with each other, with the size of casein micelles reported to be unchanged (Karlsson, Ipsen, & Ardö , 2007), increased (Singh, 2007;Srilaorkul, Ozimek, Ooraikul, Hadziyev, & Wolfe, 1991) or decreased (Erdem, 2006) as a result of UF. The results presented here indicate that no major change in the micelle size occurred during ultrafiltration/diafiltration or evaporation.…”
Section: Effect Of Mpc Manufacture On Casein Micelle Sizementioning
confidence: 69%
“…[13][14][15][16] Addition of NaCl generally increases hydration, voluminosity, screening of charges of caseins and calcium ion activity in the milk serum whereas it decreases pH and the amount of supernatant casein, 17,18 improves rehydration of casein micellar powder, 19 imparts changes in casein micellar structure and micellar mineral composition. [20][21][22] In earlier investigations, various but limited techniques have been employed to study the effect of NaCl on the structural properties of casein micelles or milk systems including transmission electron microscopy (TEM) [23][24][25] , scanning electron microscopy (SEM) 26 and dynamic light scattering (DLS). 27,28 Several methods with their certain merits have been used for the analysis of proteins structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%