1982
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/198.3.817
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observations of binary stars by speckle interferometry – III

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In their infrared speckle program, Patience et al (1998) did not detect a speckle companion for γ Tau, but placed a limit to the K band magnitude difference of ∆K = 1.04 for the system. We did not detect a separated fringe packet for the star in any of our observations, and hence we suggest that the detection from Morgan et al (1982) may be spurious. The speckle binary, θ 1 Tau, is also a SB1 (Torres et al 1997, and references therein).…”
Section: Observations and Data Reductionmentioning
confidence: 49%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In their infrared speckle program, Patience et al (1998) did not detect a speckle companion for γ Tau, but placed a limit to the K band magnitude difference of ∆K = 1.04 for the system. We did not detect a separated fringe packet for the star in any of our observations, and hence we suggest that the detection from Morgan et al (1982) may be spurious. The speckle binary, θ 1 Tau, is also a SB1 (Torres et al 1997, and references therein).…”
Section: Observations and Data Reductionmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…For instance, δ 1 Tau is a SB1 with a Mdwarf companion (Griffin & Gunn 1977) and ǫ Tau is an exo-planet host star (Sato et al 2007). γ Tau was resolved a single time as a speckle binary (with a large delta magnitude at 5000 Å) by Morgan et al (1982), having a system separation of 0.395 arcseconds. Since this measurement, it has remained undetected as a binary by other programs (McAlister 1978;Mason et al 1993;Patience et al 1998).…”
Section: Observations and Data Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the duplicity of δ 1 Tau, its secular parallax solution is well defined (π sec,Hip = 21.16 ± 0.37 mas with g Hip = 0.07 and 21 Although γ Tau was reported as ρ ∼ 0. 395 speckle double by Morgan et al (1982), Mason et al (1993) and Patience et al (1998) could not confirm this result. Griffin & Holweger (1989) summarize the confusing literature on (non-existent) radial velocity variability, and conclude the object is single.…”
Section: B2 the Giants δ 1 And θ 1 Tau And δ Arimentioning
confidence: 84%
“…A number, including δ Vel were found to be double at separations of 10 mas and greater. Using the Anglo Australian Telescope and the Imperial College speckle interferometer (Morgan et al 1982) to try and resolve some of these stars, led to a paper by Tango et al (1979). The authors stated that the subsequent fringes found in the autocorrellograms of δ Vel which indicated a companion at a distance of about 0.…”
Section: Wds 05248-5219 I 345 Hip 25298mentioning
confidence: 99%