SUMMARY There is still considerable controversy regarding the influence of blood viscosity upon CBF. We have measured CBF with microspheres in 23 cats. Autoregulation was disturbed in the left caudate nucleus by microsurgical occlusion of the left middle cerebral artery. Induced hypertension or hypotension was used and i.v. mannitol (1 g/kg) administered. In all cats blood viscosity decreased an average of 16% at 15 minutes and, in 16 cats, increased 10% at 75 minutes post-mannitol. CBF in the right caudate was 79 ± 6 ml/lOOg/min, in the left 38 ± 6 (p < 0.001). Only minor changes of CBF occurred in areas with presumed normal autoregulation, including the right caudate, in conjunction with pressure or viscosity changes. In the left caudate CBF decreased 21% with hypotension and 18% with higher viscosity, more than on the right (p < 0.01 and p < 0.2, respectively). CBF increased in the left caudate 56% with hypertension and 47% with lower viscosity, again much more than on the right ( p < 0.001 and p < 0.01, respectively). In the other area which is (nearly) exclusively supplied by the middle cerebral artery of the cat, i.e., the ectosylvian cortex, results were similar to those in the caudate nucleus. These results show that viscosity changes must result in compensatory readjustments of vessel diameter, but that these adjustments do not occur where autoregulation to pressure changes is known to be defective. The adjustments to viscosity changes might be called blood viscosity autoregulation of CBF. We hypothesize that pressure autoregulation and blood viscosity autoregulation share the same mechanism. Stroke Vol 17, No 1, 1986 THERE IS STILL CONSIDERABLE CONTROVER-SY regarding the influence of blood viscosity upon cerebral blood flow (CBF).1 One factor in this controversy is the report of some authors that changes in blood viscosity lead to changes in CBF, 2 -3 or that CBF is inversely correlated with blood viscosity, 2 -4 while others have been unable to find any relation between the two; 5 6 it has also been reported that decreasing blood viscosity leads to a large increase in CBF in ischemic brain, but to a lesser increase in nonischemic brain, if at all.7 -8 Another factor leading to uncertainty is that it remains unknown whether or not blood viscosity as measured in vitro, even at different shear rates, correlates well with viscosity as it prevails in vivo.
9In an earlier paper we found a very good correlation between changes in blood viscosity, brought about by the intravenous administration of mannitol, and changes in pial arteriolar diameter observed through a cranial window in the cat. 10 With decreased viscosity vasoconstriction occurred; with increased viscosity the pial arterioles dilated. We assumed that these vessel diameter responses were autoregulatory in nature, similar to responses to blood pressure alterations. In those experiments, however, CBF was not measured, blood pressure changes were not induced and only normal cats with normal CO 2 responsitivity and, presumably, normal autoregulati...