2018
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty728
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observations contradict galaxy size and surface brightness predictions that are based on the expanding universe hypothesis

Abstract: In a non-expanding universe, surface brightness is independent of distance or redshift, while in an expanding universe it decreases rapidly with both. Similarly, for objects of the same luminosity, the angular radius of an object in a non-expanding universe declines with redshift, while in an expanding universe this radius increases for redshifts z > 1.25. The author and colleagues have previously shown that data for the surface brightness of disc galaxies are compatible with a static universe with redshift li… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The function b = b(x), is defined as the solution of the Equation (57) (for c 2 = 0). The Equation (58), taking into account (59) and (57), becomes their differential consequence. Surprisingly, the solution for the scale factor does not depend on the constant c 2 .…”
Section: The Case Without Quadratic Termsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The function b = b(x), is defined as the solution of the Equation (57) (for c 2 = 0). The Equation (58), taking into account (59) and (57), becomes their differential consequence. Surprisingly, the solution for the scale factor does not depend on the constant c 2 .…”
Section: The Case Without Quadratic Termsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From this point of view, it is interesting to study all special points, including the equilibrium pointsḃ(t 1 ) = 0,b(t 1 ) = 0. In this regard, I want to refer to the work [59] where he gives arguments to the consistency of the static universe, from the point of view of observational data on galaxies. In the next section, we present a model of a quasistatic universe, where the scale factor fluctuates with respect to a constant value.…”
Section: The Case Without Quadratic Termsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different tests based on observational data have been proposed to provide evidence for the expansion hypothesis. A critical review of these tests shows that convincing evidence for the universal expansion is still lacking [9] [10]. The static universe model fits the observational data better than expansion models [10] [11] [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A critical review of these tests shows that convincing evidence for the universal expansion is still lacking [9] [10]. The static universe model fits the observational data better than expansion models [10] [11] [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…higher densities (Mo, Mao & White 1998;Ferguson et al, 2004;Trujillo et al, 2006), luminosity evolution (Shen et al 2003), mergers (Trujillo et al 2006(Trujillo et al , 2007, or massive outflows due to quasar feedback (Fan, Lapi, De Zotti & Danese 2008). However, the static Euclidean cosmological model fits the data without any necessity of a size evolution of a galaxy (Lerner 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%