2010
DOI: 10.1109/tcsi.2009.2018930
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observations Concerning the Locking Range in a Complementary Differential $LC$ Injection-Locked Frequency Divider—Part I: Qualitative Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, it should be highlighted that even if our experiments were performed in MHz range as in [8,16], similar results are expected at GHz range because it was shown in [5] that approximate models based on algebraic characteristics for the active parts of the divider can be effectively used at GHz frequencies.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 69%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Finally, it should be highlighted that even if our experiments were performed in MHz range as in [8,16], similar results are expected at GHz range because it was shown in [5] that approximate models based on algebraic characteristics for the active parts of the divider can be effectively used at GHz frequencies.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Thus, we conclude that (8) provides the frequency interval wherein the injectionlocked frequency divider is able to lock the input signal, that is, the so-called locking range. Expression (8) clearly shows that the locking range of direct-injection frequency dividers, differently from the locking range of frequency dividers with injection via tail device [6,9], does not depend on the circuit losses, and thus, it can be widened without lowering the quality factor and the phase noise of the divider.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…II, we recall the Arnold tongue locking scenario from nonlinear dynamics [13]. Existing experimental methods for characterizing the Arnold tongue bifucation diagram [6], [10] are described in Sec. III.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%