2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11214-022-00906-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observations and Modeling of Martian Auroras

Abstract: Observations of planetary auroras form a new area of planetary exploration from space, especially for nonmagnetic planets since various kinds of auroras like Discrete, Proton and Diffuse auroras have been observed at Mars. We review the latest results of Martian auroras obtained by the instruments (1) SPICAM (Spectroscopy for the Investigation of the Characteristics of the Atmosphere of Mars) aboard Mars Express (MEX) and ( 2) IUVS (the Imaging Ultraviolet Spectrograph) on MAVEN (the Mars Atmosphere and Volati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 232 publications
(294 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the photoelectron impact ionization rates are higher than the photoionization rates by ∼1 order of magnitude (Shah et al., 2021). The production rates of H 2 O + , HDO + , and D 2 O + depend on the modeling parameters: the mixing ratios of H 2 O, HDO, and D 2 O, air density, photo ionization/photo electron impact cross sections, photon flux, GCR flux, and yield spectrum method (Haider et al., 2016, 2022; Shah et al., 2021; Vandaele et al., 2019).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, the photoelectron impact ionization rates are higher than the photoionization rates by ∼1 order of magnitude (Shah et al., 2021). The production rates of H 2 O + , HDO + , and D 2 O + depend on the modeling parameters: the mixing ratios of H 2 O, HDO, and D 2 O, air density, photo ionization/photo electron impact cross sections, photon flux, GCR flux, and yield spectrum method (Haider et al., 2016, 2022; Shah et al., 2021; Vandaele et al., 2019).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The red star represents the production rate caused by photoelectrons resulting from model 1 due to the impact of hard X-rays, while the black star shows the production rate caused by photoelectrons resulting from model 2 due to the impact of hard X-rays. HDO, and D 2 O, air density, photo ionization/photo electron impact cross sections, photon flux, GCR flux, and yield spectrum method (Haider et al, 2016(Haider et al, , 2022Shah et al, 2021;Vandaele et al, 2019).…”
Section: Response Of H 2 O + Hdo + and D 2 O + Photoionization Rate...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…electron discrete aurora), first identified by the SPICAM (SPectroscopy for the Investigation of the Characteristics of the Atmosphere of Mars) ultraviolet spectrometer on Mars Express (Bertaux et al, 2005(Bertaux et al, , 2006Leblanc et al, 2006;Soret et al, 2016), are spatially confined photon emissions in Mars' nightside upper atmosphere, generated by the decay of electronic states in atoms and molecules primarily excited by suprathermal electrons (energies greater than ∼9 eV; Soret et al (2024)). These discrete aurorae (a total of 19 detections by SPICAM: 16 in nadir mode and 3 in limb mode), distinguishable by their small spatial scales and association with strong vertical crustal magnetic fields, differ significantly from other Mars auroral types (González-Galindo et al, 2024;Haider et al, 2022): diffuse aurora, caused by the global precipitation of solar energetic particles (Gérard et al, 2017;Nakamura et al, 2022;Schneider et al, 2015Schneider et al, , 2018, and proton aurora, resulting from solar wind protons directly entering the upper atmosphere after charge exchange with neutral hydrogen in the corona (Chaffin et al, 2022;Deighan et al, 2018;Gérard et al, 2019;Hughes et al, 2019;Ritter et al, 2018).…”
Section: Nightside Aurora On Marsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned previously, dependence of aurora on upstream solar wind parameters and IMF parameters also needs to be examined in detail (Girazian et al, 2022;Schneider et al, 2021). Furthermore, the mechanisms for particle precipitation and aurora formation require detailed exploration (Bowers et al, 2023;Brain & Halekas, 2012;Haider et al, 2022). The consequences of aurora, such as enhanced ionization (creating a "patchy" ionosphere), Joule heating of the upper atmosphere, changes in chemical composition, and enhanced ion escape via auroral flux tubes, need further investigation (Brain & Halekas, 2012;Fillingim et al, 2007;Harada et al, 2024;Shematovich et al, 2017).…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Prospectsmentioning
confidence: 99%