2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2022.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observational versus randomized controlled trials to inform antibiotic treatment durations: a narrative review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fourth, knowledge of an ongoing intervention may have led to the Hawthorne effect. 45 Nonetheless, nonresearch deprescribing implementation efforts also benefit from clinical champions, as do audit and feedback interventions. Finally, this study was not powered to measure an effect on ADEs, emergency department visits, or hospitalization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fourth, knowledge of an ongoing intervention may have led to the Hawthorne effect. 45 Nonetheless, nonresearch deprescribing implementation efforts also benefit from clinical champions, as do audit and feedback interventions. Finally, this study was not powered to measure an effect on ADEs, emergency department visits, or hospitalization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, all patients had confirmed BSI, which assures that patients had clinically relevant infections. Second, this type of study has two main possible sources of bias, which are indication and survival bias [ 20 ]. In the first case, longer courses of therapy may be chosen for patients with more severe diseases, whereas ending therapy within 7 days is most probable in patients with a favourable clinical response [ 20 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, this type of study has two main possible sources of bias, which are indication and survival bias [ 20 ]. In the first case, longer courses of therapy may be chosen for patients with more severe diseases, whereas ending therapy within 7 days is most probable in patients with a favourable clinical response [ 20 ]. We tried to minimize the risk of indication bias by evaluating distinct factors related to disease severity and controlling it in the multivariate model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although our intention was to better evaluate the indicators and avoid immortal time bias, this also made our study results not generalizable to all hematological malignancy patients. Second, there was randomness in the timing of repeating blood cultures after initiating targeted antibiotic therapy by the physicians in our study, which is a problem faced by many studies [ 22 ], as it is impossible to achieve fixed-time re-examination assembled in clinical trials. This may lead to bias in decision making of antibiotic duration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%