2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-87196-3_56
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observational Supervision for Medical Image Classification Using Gaze Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We conduct the experiments on two datasets: INbreast [34] and SIIM-ACR [44,50]. The INbreast dataset [34] includes 410 full-field digital mammography images which were collected during lowdose X-ray irradiation of the breast.…”
Section: Datasets and Evaluation Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We conduct the experiments on two datasets: INbreast [34] and SIIM-ACR [44,50]. The INbreast dataset [34] includes 410 full-field digital mammography images which were collected during lowdose X-ray irradiation of the breast.…”
Section: Datasets and Evaluation Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to BI-RADS [24] assessment of masses, the images can be classified into three groups: normal(302), benign (37) and malignant(71), respectively. Saab et al [44] randomly selected 1,170 images, with 268 cases of pneumon, from the SIIM-ACR Pneumothorax dataset [50] and collected gaze data from three radiologists. We randomly split the dataset into 80% and 20% as training and testing dataset.…”
Section: Datasets and Evaluation Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CAT2000 [3] has 2000 training images and 2000 testing images from 20 different categories with eye tracking data. The SIIM-ACR [49] is a chest X-ray dataset with only pneumothorax disease, and recently work [46] randomly selected 1,170 images, with 268 cases of pneumothorax and collected gaze data from three radiologists. Follow this work [46], we chose these 1170 images and randomly split them into 80% and 20% as training and testing dataset.…”
Section: Datasets and Evaluation Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In parallel to our project, Karargyris et al built a dataset of eye-tracking data and respective dictation of CXR reports, containing 1,083 readings by only one radiologist 18 . Saab et al built a dataset of eye-tracking data for the task of identifying pneumothoraces for 1,170 CXRs 19 . Still, their dataset does not contain dictations and focuses on the general differences in eye-tracking data for normal and abnormal images.…”
Section: Background and Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%