2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observational study on complementary relationship between pan evaporation and actual evapotranspiration and its variation with pan type

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[], and Zuo et al . [], among many others. The complementary principle is appealing because of its physical plausibility and the fact that it requires only routine meteorological variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[], and Zuo et al . [], among many others. The complementary principle is appealing because of its physical plausibility and the fact that it requires only routine meteorological variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the early proponents, Brutsaert and Stricker [1979] and Morton [1983] further advanced this idea by developing, respectively, the advection-aridity approach and the complementary relationship areal evapotranspiration method. Subsequently an increasing number of studies in hydrology have made use of Bouchet's complementary principle or its extension by Brutsaert and Parlange [1998]; these include Granger [1989], Granger and Gray [1989], Lemeur and Zhang [1990], Hobbins et al [2001], Kahler and Brutsaert [2006], Szilagyi [2007], Han et al [2011], Han et al, [2012], Brutsaert [2015], Aminzadeh et al [2016], and Zuo et al [2016], among many others. The complementary principle is appealing because of its physical plausibility and the fact that it requires only routine meteorological variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These devices are used by meteorological and climate scientists, agricultural scientists, and hydrologists [12,20,21]. Although pan evaporation (E pan ) measured from various types of evaporimeters cannot completely represent the actual evaporation [22,23], it can provide in-depth Supported by a wood frame and the bottom is 5 cm higher than ground, popular in USA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The consistent performance of E p calculated by the FAO Penman-Monteith model further confirms that the R n following the FAO was better ( Figure 5). In contrast to the Class A and φ20, the E601 was embedded into the soil with its rim 30 cm above the ground and surrounded by four arc water troughs 20 cm in width that reduce the edge effects of turbulence generated by the rim of the pan [14,43]. Thus we thought the R n above the surface of the E601 was overestimated.…”
Section: Pan Evaporationmentioning
confidence: 76%