2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.11.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observational gait analysis in traumatic brain injury: Accuracy of clinical judgment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
32
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
32
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Only a very small percentage of TTH patients with TSCI/TBI were hospitalised for ≥ 60 days (~2%), suggesting that the vast majority of TSCI/TBI patients at discharge (~98%) were, in fact, below the post-injury time-point of the NHO peak manifestation. The highest incidence of TSCI/TBI has been reported as being in the 15-25 year old age group (19,20) however our data showed that TSCI/TBI patients admitted to TTH were approximately twice as old as typical TSCI/TBI patients. NHO has also been reported to be primarily diagnosed within this younger age group (2,5,(16)(17)(18) and thus the age-related differences in the NHO incidence cannot be excluded as a biasing factor in our results.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…Only a very small percentage of TTH patients with TSCI/TBI were hospitalised for ≥ 60 days (~2%), suggesting that the vast majority of TSCI/TBI patients at discharge (~98%) were, in fact, below the post-injury time-point of the NHO peak manifestation. The highest incidence of TSCI/TBI has been reported as being in the 15-25 year old age group (19,20) however our data showed that TSCI/TBI patients admitted to TTH were approximately twice as old as typical TSCI/TBI patients. NHO has also been reported to be primarily diagnosed within this younger age group (2,5,(16)(17)(18) and thus the age-related differences in the NHO incidence cannot be excluded as a biasing factor in our results.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…Data from one participant were discarded as he had developed a painful knee between test days, resulting in significant differences in his gait pattern on the 2nd day. The median Nurick classification was 2 (range 1-4), and the median Modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association score was 11 (range: [8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. Kinetic data was not available for two of the 12 patients, as one failed to strike the force plate cleanly due to a short stride length, and the other used a stick that contacted the force plate, contaminating the results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Timed walk tests are more sensitive to change and are known to be valid and reliable in CSM [8], however they give no information on the underlying gait parameters that have contributed to the measured speed [10]. Observational gait analysis is by far the most commonly used method of evaluating gait disturbance in CSM, however its accuracy is questionable, particularly for subtle gait changes [11,12]. A more accurate, sensitive and detailed method of evaluating gait disturbance in CSM is therefore needed to support diagnosis, measure severity, and evaluate outcome.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Selected temporospatial characteristics of overground walking in adults with TBI have been reported over the past decade [3,[5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. In general, individuals with TBI walk slower with shorter steps following TBI [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%