2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-28521-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observational evidence of ring current in the magnetosphere of Mercury

Abstract: The magnetic gradient and curvature drift of energetic ions can form a longitudinal electric current around a planet known as the ring current, that has been observed in the intrinsic magnetospheres of Earth, Jupiter, and Saturn. However, there is still a lack of observational evidence of ring current in Mercury’s magnetosphere, which has a significantly weaker dipole magnetic field. Under such conditions, charged particles are thought to be efficiently lost through magnetopause shadowing and/or directly impac… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(89 reference statements)
7
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During the time interval in which the MIA FOV is directed within the loss cone predicted by the KT17 model, the ion flux measured by MIA is > 10 times lower than that at the adjacent times. This is in agreement with the ion loss cone observed by MESSENGER within Mercury's magnetosphere (J. T. Zhao et al., 2020, 2022; Winslow et al., 2014), though we cannot conclusively confirm the ion loss cone from the flyby MIA data due to the limited FOV. In‐orbit observations by MIA will provide the full 4 π coverage, and in combination with magnetic field measurements, comprehensive energy–pitch‐angle distributions of ions will be available.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…During the time interval in which the MIA FOV is directed within the loss cone predicted by the KT17 model, the ion flux measured by MIA is > 10 times lower than that at the adjacent times. This is in agreement with the ion loss cone observed by MESSENGER within Mercury's magnetosphere (J. T. Zhao et al., 2020, 2022; Winslow et al., 2014), though we cannot conclusively confirm the ion loss cone from the flyby MIA data due to the limited FOV. In‐orbit observations by MIA will provide the full 4 π coverage, and in combination with magnetic field measurements, comprehensive energy–pitch‐angle distributions of ions will be available.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The magnetic field direction changes from dawnward to northward, and the strength decreases gradually as the spacecraft moves toward the equator. The increasing signature in the proton flux coincides with the previous statistics about the background proton distribution (Zhao et al., 2022). The absence of the protons with a pitch angle of ∼180° can be seen in Figure 2b, while the conjugate proton with a pitch angle of ∼0° is not measurable due to the limited field of view of FIPS.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The total energy of the magnetic storm at Mercury for the event studied is estimated to be ~10 12 J (where MDst = −60 nT), which is three orders of magnitude smaller than for typical magnetic storms at Earth. This estimation is an order of magnitude of the previous estimation from the FIPS measurement of 50 eV-13.6 keV protons [6], implying that more comprehensive particle measurements are required in the further investigation. Additionally, the ring current morphology may differ from the Earth's ring current as demonstrated in Zhao et al [6].…”
Section: Discussion and Summarymentioning
confidence: 63%
“…This estimation is an order of magnitude of the previous estimation from the FIPS measurement of 50 eV-13.6 keV protons [6], implying that more comprehensive particle measurements are required in the further investigation. Additionally, the ring current morphology may differ from the Earth's ring current as demonstrated in Zhao et al [6]. Under such strong solar wind enforcement (R SS < 1.35 R M ), this ring current is mostly in the equatorial plane on the nightside, but splits into two parts on the dayside; one in the northern mid-latitude region and the other in the southern mid-latitude region.…”
Section: Discussion and Summarymentioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation