Observational cross-sectional study of the association of poor broadband provision with demographic and health outcomes: the Wolverhampton Digital ENablement (WODEN) programme

Abstract

ObjectivesThe association between impaired digital provision, access and health outcomes has not been systematically studied. The Wolverhampton Digital ENablement programme (WODEN) is a multiagency collaborative approach to determine and address digital factors that may impact on health and social care in a single deprived multiethnic health economy. The objective of this study is to determine the association between measurable broadband provision and demographic and health outcomes in a defined population.DesignAn observational cross-sectional whole local population-level study with cohorts defined according to broadband provision.Setting/participantsData for all residents of the City of Wolverhampton, totalling 269 785 residents.Primary outcomesPoor broadband provision is associated with variation in demographics and with increased comorbidity and urgent care needs.ResultsBroadband provision was measured using the Broadband Infrastructure Index (BII) in 158 City localities housing a total of 269 785 residents. Lower broadband provision as determined by BII was associated with younger age (p<0.001), white ethnic status (p<0.001), lesser deprivation as measured by Index of Multiple Deprivation (p<0.001), a higher number of health comorbidities (p<0.001) and more non-elective urgent events over 12 months (p<0.001).ConclusionLocal municipal and health authorities are advised to consider the variations in broadband provision within their locality and determine equal distribution both on a geographical basis but also against demographic, health and social data to determine equitable distribution as a platform for equitable access to digital resources for their residents.

Global disparities in the treatment of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: results from an international online survey study

“…We also acknowledge that the demographic characteristics of the respondents may be driven by those who respond to e-surveys in general rather than reflecting the population level attributes of individuals living with IIM worldwide (17). In addition, the cross-sectional design of this study would not allow any identification of specific treatment algorithms, rather than providing a snapshot of the current treatments.…”

Exploring stroke survivors’ and physiotherapists’ perspectives of the potential for markerless motion capture technology in community rehabilitation

“…Technology which uses markerless motion capture technology and accurately assesses user movement during exercises could be an easy way to facilitate telerehabilitation in the home. Whilst telerehabilitation enables increased access through removal of geographical barriers, availability of equipment, possibly driven by cost and digital provision may present and alternative barrier to both patients and services [20]. Single device markerless hardware that allows for extraction of 3D measurements is becoming more readily available in personal computing devices and mobile phones which are more readily affordable.…”

“…Single camera, markerless systems are easy to setup, require no specialist skill for the capture and interpretation of data compared to hospital or laboratory systems so can be used in patients' homes, overcoming access barriers associated with hospital-based services [19]. However, it is important that implementation of technology into services does not further embed social health inequalities and is acceptable and feasible for the intended users and providers of the service [20].…”

Health Equity in Rheumatology: A Global Health Perspective

“…34 Low-income neighbourhoods, such as Wolverhampton in the UK, exhibit disparities due to a lack of high-quality and reliable broadband services that significantly reduce access to telemedicine services. 35 Furthermore, historically marginalized and segregated communities suffer from significant disparities at the intersection of poverty and race. Based on evidence in the literature spanning time frames of 2011-2016 and 1997-2015, respectively, African American and Hispanic patients had worse disease manifestations and outcomes than Caucasian patients with rheumatoid arthritis in the USA, which persisted even after adjusting for age and gender.…”