2010
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/200913058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observational constraints on well-posed reconstruction methods and the optimization-Grad-Rubin method

Abstract: Context. Grad-Rubin type methods are interesting candidates for reconstructing the force-free magnetic field of a solar coronal region. As input these methods, however, require the normal component B n of the field on the whole boundary of the numerical box and the force-free function α on the part of the boundary where B n > 0 (or B n < 0), while observations provide data only on its lower photospheric part. Moreover, they introduce an unpleasing asymmetry between the opposite polarity parts of the boundary, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the recent years, the optimization scheme has been developed to include more constraints and thus to obtain an equilibrium closer to a force-free field. -Grad-Rubin methods: the nonlinear force-free equation being a system of partial differential equations of mixed type, the method described by Grad and Rubin (1958) consists in separating the elliptic part (force-free equation) and the hyperbolic part (gradient of α) of the system, each system being then linear and easier to solve (Grad and Rubin, 1958;Sakurai, 1981;Amari et al, 1997;Amari, Boulmezaoud, and Mikic, 1999;Wheatland, 2004;Amari, Boulmezaoud, and Aly, 2006;Inhester and Wiegelmann, 2006;Wheatland, 2006;Wheatland and Régnier, 2009;Malanushenko, Longcope, and McKenzie, 2009;Amari and Aly, 2010;Malanushenko et al, 2012). The Grad-Rubin method requires as boundary conditions the vertical/radial component of the magnetic field on each boundary, as well as the distribution of α in a chosen polarity.…”
Section: Nonlinear Force-free Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the recent years, the optimization scheme has been developed to include more constraints and thus to obtain an equilibrium closer to a force-free field. -Grad-Rubin methods: the nonlinear force-free equation being a system of partial differential equations of mixed type, the method described by Grad and Rubin (1958) consists in separating the elliptic part (force-free equation) and the hyperbolic part (gradient of α) of the system, each system being then linear and easier to solve (Grad and Rubin, 1958;Sakurai, 1981;Amari et al, 1997;Amari, Boulmezaoud, and Mikic, 1999;Wheatland, 2004;Amari, Boulmezaoud, and Aly, 2006;Inhester and Wiegelmann, 2006;Wheatland, 2006;Wheatland and Régnier, 2009;Malanushenko, Longcope, and McKenzie, 2009;Amari and Aly, 2010;Malanushenko et al, 2012). The Grad-Rubin method requires as boundary conditions the vertical/radial component of the magnetic field on each boundary, as well as the distribution of α in a chosen polarity.…”
Section: Nonlinear Force-free Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Noise in α at the lower boundary and limits to the field of view prevent this condition from being satisfied, and the problem is in general ill-posed (Aly 1989). Techniques exist for "pre-processing" of the boundary data to attempt to mitigate this problem (e.g., Wiegelmann et al 2006Wiegelmann et al , 2008 and for formulating a well-posed problem given the uncertainties in the measurements (Amari & Aly 2010;Wheatland & Régnier 2009;Wheatland & Leka 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We just recall here that the most frequently used ones are (i) the optimization method (Wiegelmann 2004), which uses all photospheric data and tries to minimize a cost function measuring the difference between the computed transverse field and the measured one; (ii) the vertical integration method, which also uses all photospheric data (Song et al 2006); (iii) the relaxation methods (Valori et al 2005), in which the coronal field is obtained as the result of an MHD evolution driven by boundary conditions depending on the observed field; and (iv) the Grad-Rubin methods (Sakurai 1981;Amari et al 1999Amari et al , 2006Wheatland 2007;Wheatland & Regnier 2009), which only use a part of the observational data. There is also a hybrid method called OGRM (Amari & Aly 2010) which combines a Grad-Rubin iterative scheme with an optimization scheme by selecting the most appropriate boundary values of the force-free function α at each step.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%