2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.dark.2022.101131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observational constraints on the interacting dark energy — Dark matter (IDM) cosmological models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 109 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Models were the interaction reverses sign, IDE are preferred to the concordance model, the Hubble tension is alleviated but the S 8 tension still persists. In [175] the model gives an acceptable value of the Hubble parameter. In [355] Planck 2018 data and local measurements of the Hubble constant indicated the coupling was non-zero at the 3σ C.L.…”
Section: The Tension In the λCdm Modelmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Models were the interaction reverses sign, IDE are preferred to the concordance model, the Hubble tension is alleviated but the S 8 tension still persists. In [175] the model gives an acceptable value of the Hubble parameter. In [355] Planck 2018 data and local measurements of the Hubble constant indicated the coupling was non-zero at the 3σ C.L.…”
Section: The Tension In the λCdm Modelmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…IDE models and models with DM or DE self-interaction have also been analyzed [41]. The interaction can be seen as a open thermodynamical system [175]. In [306] the decay rate is constant, similar to radiactive decay.…”
Section: New Phenomenological Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation