The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2006
DOI: 10.1088/1126-6708/2006/03/039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observational consequences of a landscape

Abstract: In this follow-up to [2] we briefly discuss the implications of the apparent detection of B-modes in the Cosmic Microwave Background for the issues raised in that paper. We argue that under the assumptions of eternal inflation, there is now stronger support for the detectability of a Coleman-De Luccia bubble nucleation event in our past. In particular, the odds that the spatial curvature of the universe is large enough to be detectable by near future experiments are increased.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

24
452
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 299 publications
(479 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
24
452
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the probability of N e e-folds of inflation is proportional to 1/N 3 e . This result can be derived analytically in an inflection point model [240] (see [661] for earlier work in a slightly different model), and is consistent with the simpler analytic arguments of §5.1.2, which focused on the appearance of the term φ 3/2 in an effective single-field description. Of course, the total number of e-folds is not itself an observable, but whether or not N e 60 strongly influences the likelihood of observing relics of a pre-inflationary stage, such as traces of bubble collisions [678][679][680][681][682].…”
Section: Multi-field Effectssupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, the probability of N e e-folds of inflation is proportional to 1/N 3 e . This result can be derived analytically in an inflection point model [240] (see [661] for earlier work in a slightly different model), and is consistent with the simpler analytic arguments of §5.1.2, which focused on the appearance of the term φ 3/2 in an effective single-field description. Of course, the total number of e-folds is not itself an observable, but whether or not N e 60 strongly influences the likelihood of observing relics of a pre-inflationary stage, such as traces of bubble collisions [678][679][680][681][682].…”
Section: Multi-field Effectssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The DBI kinetic term (see §5.3) has been argued to ameliorate the overshoot problem [659], though this conclusion was challenged by [660]. Negative spatial curvature resulting from tunneling entirely removes overshooting in certain classes of potential, and reduces its severity in general [661,662]. Finally, it was argued in [663] that the overshooting of an inflection point is ameliorated by particle production near points in field space where new species become light [664][665][666][667].…”
Section: Fine-tuningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, by introducing fine tunings it is possible to construct inflation models with observationally interesting open geometries (e.g., Gott 1982;Linde 1995;Bucher et al 1995;Linde 1999) or closed geometries (Linde 2003). Even more speculatively, there has been interest in models with open geometries from considerations of tunnelling events between metastable vacua within a "string landscape" (Freivogel et al 2006). Observational limits on spatial curvature therefore offer important additional constraints on inflationary models and fundamental physics.…”
Section: Curvaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The condition (4.9) in turn ensures that the quadratic term in the round brackets of (4.8) dominates over the quartic term in the axion, although the latter could become significant at the outer edge of the super-Planckian regime. (This latter effect may be interesting in light of the hints of a tension between Planck and BICEP2 [82][83][84][85], although that tension is highly uncertain given [86,87] as well as foreground unknowns. )…”
Section: Jhep09(2014)123mentioning
confidence: 99%