2021
DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2021-322390
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observational cohort study of changing trends in non-invasive ventilation in very preterm infants and associations with clinical outcomes

Abstract: ObjectiveTo determine the change in non-invasive ventilation (NIV) use over time in infants born at <32 weeks’ gestation and the associated clinical outcomes.Study designRetrospective cohort study using routinely recorded data from the National Neonatal Research Database of infants born at <32 weeks admitted to neonatal units in England and Wales from 2010 to 2017.ResultsIn 56 537 infants, NIV use increased significantly between 2010 and 2017 (continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) from 68.5% to 80.2… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
28
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the subgroup analysis including only the extremely preterm infants, we found that the percentage who died was significantly higher in the group that did not have a PDA and the adjusted odds of death remained statistically significantly higher in that group even after adjustment for GA. We did not exclude early deaths and infants who survived were more likely to have undergone a clinical or echocardiographic evaluation resulting in a diagnosis of PDA as compared with those who did not live long enough for such a diagnosis to be made. We have reported similar confounding in other reports10 and such survival bias is a recognised limitation of observational studies particularly in a population such as extremely preterm infants where there is a high risk of early deaths.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…In the subgroup analysis including only the extremely preterm infants, we found that the percentage who died was significantly higher in the group that did not have a PDA and the adjusted odds of death remained statistically significantly higher in that group even after adjustment for GA. We did not exclude early deaths and infants who survived were more likely to have undergone a clinical or echocardiographic evaluation resulting in a diagnosis of PDA as compared with those who did not live long enough for such a diagnosis to be made. We have reported similar confounding in other reports10 and such survival bias is a recognised limitation of observational studies particularly in a population such as extremely preterm infants where there is a high risk of early deaths.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…In this group of patients, HFNT is an increasingly used alternative to low-flow oxygen and noninvasive or invasive ventilatory support for the long-term management of respiratory insufficiency. 11 HFNT reduces the work of breathing to an extent comparable to CPAP. 12 Simple handling, good patient tolerance of a comfortable interface with an overall good accessibility of the child render HFNT particularly attractive for neonates and infants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…30 Our classification could be clinically useful in further understanding the pathophysiology of extremely preterm morbidity and mortality and possibly in targeting selected subgroups of infants for specific interventions. For example, for cluster 4, such interventions might include administration of postnatal corticosteroids to assist earlier weaning from invasive respiratory support, 31 more gentle resuscitation methods, avoidance of mechanical ventilation by newer non-invasive techniques 32 and use of less invasive surfactant administration, which has been shown to reduce the incidence of BPD. 33 The within-group association of increased mortality and birth outside a tertiary hospital in cluster 3 could also strengthen the argument for the centralisation of the care of extreme preterms concentrating on high-volume perinatal centres.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%