2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2227-7_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observational Appearance of Black Holes in X-Ray Binaries and AGN

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Over the past 15 yr, a number of other relevant in-depth reviews have been prepared that have some overlap with the topics discussed here. These include Hasinger and Zamorani (2000), Gilli (2004), Brandt and Hasinger (2005), Urry and Treister (2007), Hickox (2009), Brandt and Alexander (2010), , , Kormendy and Ho (2013), Merloni and Heinz (2013), Shankar (2013), and Gilfanov and Merloni (2014). We encourage interested readers to consult these reviews as well, noting that they generally emphasize somewhat different topics than those emphasized here.…”
Section: Structure Of This Review Other Relevant Reviews and Definimentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Over the past 15 yr, a number of other relevant in-depth reviews have been prepared that have some overlap with the topics discussed here. These include Hasinger and Zamorani (2000), Gilli (2004), Brandt and Hasinger (2005), Urry and Treister (2007), Hickox (2009), Brandt and Alexander (2010), , , Kormendy and Ho (2013), Merloni and Heinz (2013), Shankar (2013), and Gilfanov and Merloni (2014). We encourage interested readers to consult these reviews as well, noting that they generally emphasize somewhat different topics than those emphasized here.…”
Section: Structure Of This Review Other Relevant Reviews and Definimentioning
confidence: 92%
“…These physical processes span scales from the immediate vicinity of the SMBH (light minutes to light hours) to that of the obscuring material (light days to light years). Such survey-based physical investigations critically complement the in-depth targeted X-ray studies of individual and small samples of AGNs that are another major thrust of X-ray astronomy (e.g., Mushotzky et al 1993;Reynolds and Nowak 2003;Fabian 2006;Turner and Miller 2009;Done 2010;Gilfanov and Merloni 2014). In this section, we will briefly review results on AGN physics coming from three key areas of survey-based investigation: the basic properties, luminosity dependence, and redshift dependence of AGN X-ray obscuration (Section 4.1), X-ray-to-optical/UV SEDs (Section 4.2), and the X-ray continuum shape and its connection to Eddington ratio (Section 4.3).…”
Section: Agn Physicsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(Gilfanov et al 2015) [15]. Just as there are two major types of black holes, stellar-mass and supermassive, and two types of singularities, gravitational and ring singularities, it is our suggestion for two different categories of accretion disks.…”
Section: Accretions Disk and Supermassive Black Hole Creationmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…This "blue bump emission" is difficult to observe owing to the presence of a large number of emission lines contaminating the signal and will not be discussed further in this thesis (see e.g. Gilfanov and Merloni (2014)). The thermal emission from accretion disks surrounding BHBs is modeled using the NT prescription described in Section 1.3.1.…”
Section: General Relativistic Magnetohydrodynamic Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%