2011 6th International Workshop on Advanced Ground Penetrating Radar (IWAGPR) 2011
DOI: 10.1109/iwagpr.2011.5963910
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observation of volumetric water content and reflector depth with multichannel ground-penetrating radar in an artificial sand volume

Abstract: The performance of the multichannel groundpenetrating radar (GPR) method introduced by [1] to simultaneously estimate reflector depth and average volumetric soil water content is tested on an artificial soil volume. The test site consists of several layers of sand which are partly water saturated. Volumetric water content and reflector depth deduced from the GPR measurements are compared with in situ measurements. It is shown that both reflector depth and volumetric water content can be reconstructed with an a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reflection GPR is commonly used to image subsurface structures, but is also well suited to understanding hydrologic variability due to the strong dependence of EM wave velocities on soil volumetric water content (Topp et al, 1980). As a result, GPR has been adapted to monitor variability in hydrologic processes at multiple scales through time and space in a variety of contexts (Buchner et al, 2011;Busch et al, 2013;Guo et al, 2014;Haarder et al, 2011;Lunt et al, 2005;Mangel et al, 2012Mangel et al, , 2015bMangel et al, , 2017Moysey, 2010;Saintenoy et al, 2007;Steelman and Endres, 2010;Vellidis et al, 1990). Note that GPR methods are not applicable in media with relatively high electrical conductivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reflection GPR is commonly used to image subsurface structures, but is also well suited to understanding hydrologic variability due to the strong dependence of EM wave velocities on soil volumetric water content (Topp et al, 1980). As a result, GPR has been adapted to monitor variability in hydrologic processes at multiple scales through time and space in a variety of contexts (Buchner et al, 2011;Busch et al, 2013;Guo et al, 2014;Haarder et al, 2011;Lunt et al, 2005;Mangel et al, 2012Mangel et al, , 2015bMangel et al, , 2017Moysey, 2010;Saintenoy et al, 2007;Steelman and Endres, 2010;Vellidis et al, 1990). Note that GPR methods are not applicable in media with relatively high electrical conductivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent applications of time‐lapse reflection profiling to extract changes in vertical soil moisture information have been promising [i.e., Lunt et al , 2005; Wollschläger and Roth , 2005; Grote et al , 2005; Buchner et al , 2011]. This approach is less susceptible to measurement errors compared to NMO analysis; hence, it is potentially a more suitable technique to monitor highly variable soil conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%