1997
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.79.3648
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observation of the Ultimate Regime in Rayleigh-Bénard Convection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

27
292
4
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 257 publications
(327 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(18 reference statements)
27
292
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…11 They predict a transition to an "ultimate" regime similar to Kraichnan's for Ra 10 14 and argue that their log correction would yield an effective scaling 12 of about Nu ∼ Ra 0.38 in the range 10 12 < Ra < 10 15 . Some experimental results show transition to an ultimate regime [13][14][15][16] while others do not. 17,18 However, all the data are well-fitted by Nu ∼ 0.105 Ra 0.31 for Ra < 10 11 and that is the regime for which we report on unstable coherent states, in particular optimum transport solutions with Nu ∼ 0.115 Ra 0.31 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 They predict a transition to an "ultimate" regime similar to Kraichnan's for Ra 10 14 and argue that their log correction would yield an effective scaling 12 of about Nu ∼ Ra 0.38 in the range 10 12 < Ra < 10 15 . Some experimental results show transition to an ultimate regime [13][14][15][16] while others do not. 17,18 However, all the data are well-fitted by Nu ∼ 0.105 Ra 0.31 for Ra < 10 11 and that is the regime for which we report on unstable coherent states, in particular optimum transport solutions with Nu ∼ 0.115 Ra 0.31 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In experiments, traditionally the Prandtl number was more or less kept fixed [2][3][4]. However, the recent experiments in the vicinity of the critical point of helium gas [5,6] and of SF 6 [7] or with various alcohols [8] allow to vary both Ra and P r and thus to explore a larger domain of the Ra−P r parameter space of Rayleigh-Benard (RB) convection, in particular that for P r ≫ 1. While the experiments of Steinberg's group [7] suggest a decreasing Nusselt number with increasing P r, namely Nu = 0.22Ra 0.3±0.03 P r −0.2±0.04 in 10 9 ≤ Ra ≤ 10 14 and 1 ≤ P r ≤ 93, the experiments of the Ahlers group suggest a saturation of Nu with increasing P r for fixed Ra, at least up to Ra = 10 10 [9].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relevant velocity at the edge between the thermal BL and the thermal bulk now is less than U, about Uλ θ /λ u . To describe the transition from λ u being smaller to being larger than λ θ we introduce the function f (x) = (1 + [5], diamonds those by Cioni et al [4], circles those by Niemela et al [6], the very thick lines those by Xu et al [8], and the triangles are those points for which Verzicco and Camussi did full numerical simulations [10]. The long-dashed line is the line λ u = λ θ .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7, we compare this regime with the Nu ∼ P r 0.072 Ra 0.389 approximate power-law measured by Chavanne et al [28] in Helium, at Ra > 10 11 . Our formula predicts a very weak dependence of in the Prandtl number, like in [28], but with opposite sign. This could be accounted for minute variations of the mean profile around the value ǫ = −1/2.…”
Section: Te Convection and Heat Transfermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Summary of local exponents of different physical quantities in regime 6: P r > 0.35, fluctuations dominates and λ θ ≫ λ u . The measurements are from [28]. In this table X = ln Ra and Y = ln P r. No dependence on X or Y of the scaling exponent indicates real scaling with respect to Ra or P r respectively.…”
Section: Q(xy)mentioning
confidence: 99%