Cleo: 2015 2015
DOI: 10.1364/cleo_qels.2015.fm1e.2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observation of the Nonlinear Phase Shift Due to Single Post-Selected Photons

Abstract: We implement a strong optical nonlinearity using electromagnetically-induced transparency in cold atoms, and measure the resulting nonlinear phase shift for postselected photons. We believe that this represents the first direct measurement of the cross-phase shift due to individual photons.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These investigations are part of the general drive of using atomic ensembles to mediate strong photon–photon interactions1213, for example, via strong long-range dipole–dipole interaction between Rydberg atoms14 or via the a.c. Stark shift1516. Experimental realizations of photon–photon interaction using Rydberg states17181920, and the a.c. Stark shift212223242526 have furthermore enabled applications such as all-optical switching27282930. Finally, we note that non-destructive detection has been achieved for microwave photons inside cavities using superconducting circuits31 and Rydberg atoms323334.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…These investigations are part of the general drive of using atomic ensembles to mediate strong photon–photon interactions1213, for example, via strong long-range dipole–dipole interaction between Rydberg atoms14 or via the a.c. Stark shift1516. Experimental realizations of photon–photon interaction using Rydberg states17181920, and the a.c. Stark shift212223242526 have furthermore enabled applications such as all-optical switching27282930. Finally, we note that non-destructive detection has been achieved for microwave photons inside cavities using superconducting circuits31 and Rydberg atoms323334.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…One interesting example is that of stationary light, where two counter-propagating control fields are used to stop the propagation of an EIT polariton even though a portion of the excitation remains optical [16,17,18,19,20,21]. The optical part can be used to generate a nonlinear interaction, necessary for optical quantum gates [22,23,24,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where n now refers to the photon number in the probe, Ĉ is the photon number in the system, and gS ( g) is the coupling due to the SPM (XPM). Integrating along the fiber yields the coefficient g S (g) for the SPM (XPM), such that the evolution is given by U = e −ig S n2 −ig Ĉ n. The XPM represents an interaction involving a single photon, and thus, measuring g is highly important for many applications [32,33]. An experiment to achieve this was recently performed by Matsuda et al [25], using the standard approach as described above.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%